Question:
In Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2023) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court:
In Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2023) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court:
Updated On: Dec 14, 2024
- upheld the constitutional validity of the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 that empowered the State to enact special provisions for the advancement of economically weaker sections (“EWS”) of society.
- declared the EWS reservation under The Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 unconstitutional.
- held that the EWS reservation exceeds the 50% cap on reservations and is therefore invalid.
- ruled that only socially and educationally backward classes are eligible for reservation, excluding EWS.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
The Supreme Court in Janhit Abhiyan upheld the constitutional validity of the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, which provides for special provisions for the advancement of the economically weaker sections (EWS) of society. This decision affirmed the constitutional recognition of EWS reservation and its legal standing.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Constitutional Laws
- Which Constitutional Amendment Act introduced the concept of consequential seniority in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Under the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987, which of the following persons who have to file or defend a case is entitled to legal services under the Act?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the following cases, talaq-e-biddat was declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Which of the following cases held that a constitutional authority cannot do indirectly what it is not permitted to do directly, specifically in the context of repromulgation of ordinances, and considered this practice as a fraud on the Constitution?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Which constitutional authority is allowed to empower any other court (except the Supreme Court) to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers (to issue directions or orders or writs) exercisable by the Supreme Court under Article 32?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AILET LLM exam
- In which of the following cases was it held that “the tribunal has unfettered jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute raised as well as to decide the legality of an order of the Central Government, or even the opinion of TRAI or any other expert body”?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Administrative Law
- Match the following offences with the corresponding Sections under BNS, 2023:Select the correct options:
Offenses Sections (A) Voyeurism (1) Section 77 (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman (2) Section 79 (C) Stalking (3) Section 75 (D) Sexual Harassment (4) Section 78 - AILET LLM - 2025
- Administrative Law
- As per the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, which of the following statement is false?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Family Laws
- Inference about the existence of the contract can be made from the letters, emails, and other correspondence between the parties. Pick the correct options:
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Laws of Contract
- In relation to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 match the following and identify correct answer:Select the correct option:
(A) Conditions for a Hindu Marriage (i) Section 13 (B) Registration of Hindu Marriage (ii) Section 10 (C) Judicial Separation (iii) Section 5 (D) Divorce (iv) Section 8 - AILET LLM - 2025
- Family Laws
View More Questions