Question:
In Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2023) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court:
In Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2023) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court:
Updated On: Dec 14, 2024
- upheld the constitutional validity of the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 that empowered the State to enact special provisions for the advancement of economically weaker sections (“EWS”) of society.
- declared the EWS reservation under The Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 unconstitutional.
- held that the EWS reservation exceeds the 50% cap on reservations and is therefore invalid.
- ruled that only socially and educationally backward classes are eligible for reservation, excluding EWS.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
The Supreme Court in Janhit Abhiyan upheld the constitutional validity of the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, which provides for special provisions for the advancement of the economically weaker sections (EWS) of society. This decision affirmed the constitutional recognition of EWS reservation and its legal standing.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Constitutional Laws
- Match the following:
I. Chief Election Commissioner A. Elected by Rajya Sabha
II. Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha B. Elected by Members of Lok Sabha
III. Speaker of Lok Sabha C. Appointed by the President
IV. Chairman of Public Accounts Committee D. Appointed by the Speaker of Lok Sabha
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the following cases, the concept of curative petition was evolved by the Supreme Court of India?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Consider the following Assertion [A] and Reasoning [R]:
[A] The Supreme Court of India ordinarily does not interfere with order of acquittal passed by the High Court in the favor of accused.
[R] The power vested in the Court under Article 136 of the Constitution is plenary, hence the Court itself set the limits by permitting invocation of this power in very exceptional circumstances.
Choose the most suitable answer from the below given options.
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the following cases has the Supreme Court of India directed the Central Government to constitute a National Tribunals Commission (NTC), an independent body to supervise the functioning of tribunals in India?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India held that the principle of res judicata applies to a petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution if a similar petition, on the same cause of action, has already been dismissed on merits by a High Court under Article 226?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AILET LLM exam
- Which of the following is not an act included in the exclusive rights of performers under Section 38A(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Intellectual Property Law
- What must be shown before the court to obtain an injunction to stop nuisance?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Law of Torts
- Which of the following statement is not true regarding the object of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Environmental Law
- Which of the following statement regarding the application of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is not true?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Criminal Law
- For the purposes of Section 13A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the word ‘Political party’ means a political party registered under ____.
View More Questions