Remember the four necessary conditions for deadlock (Coffman conditions):
1. Mutual Exclusion: Resources cannot be shared.
2. Hold and Wait: A process holds at least one resource and is waiting for another.
3. No Preemption: Resources cannot be forcibly taken from a process. 4. Circular Wait: A closed chain of processes exists, such that each process holds at least one resource needed by the next process in the chain.
Step 1: Define deadlock.
A deadlock is a state in which each member of a group of processes is waiting for some other member to release a resource. Since all processes are waiting, none of them can proceed, and they are stuck in a permanent state of waiting. This situation is also known as a circular wait.
Step 2: Evaluate the options based on the definition.
(A) This statement perfectly describes the deadlock condition, specifically the circular wait condition where Process 1 waits for a resource held by Process 2, and Process 2 waits for a resource held by Process 1.
(B) A process exceeding its time slice is handled by the scheduler, which will preempt the process. This is related to scheduling, not deadlock.
(C) Running out of memory is a memory management issue that can cause processes to fail or the system to slow down (thrash), but it is not a deadlock.
(D) A process entering the running state is a normal part of the process life cycle.
Conclusion: The defining characteristic of a deadlock is a set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held by another process in the set.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |