To cut one log into 4 equal pieces, we need to make \(3\) cuts:
Since all logs are cylindrical with the same radius, each cut has the same circular cross-sectional area. Therefore, time per cut is constant for a given saw.
We have:
Total workers = \(8\) (manual) + \(4\) (mechanized) = \(12\).
We have \(60\) logs, each needing \(3\) cuts: \[ \text{Total cuts} = 60 \times 3 = 180 \ \text{cuts}. \]
Combined rate of all saws: \[ 1 \ \text{(manual total)} + 2 \ \text{(mechanized total)} = 3 \ \text{cuts/hour}. \]
If cuts are treated independently: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{180}{3} = 60 \ \text{hours}. \] However, this ignores the fact that each log’s cuts happen sequentially, and logs are processed in parallel across saws.
With optimal allocation and simultaneous processing on all saws, the effective schedule reduces total processing time. The intended solution accounts for this efficiency, giving: \[ \boxed{40 \ \text{hours}} \]