The author expresses their uncertainty by comparing the revolutionary changes brought by the Gutenberg printing press to the potential impacts of the iPhone. The assertion is that while the iPhone has influenced many aspects of life, similar to the printing press, it hasn't yet led to a single magnificent idea or widely opened minds for democracy and religion as the printing press did. The author questions whether the iPhone can lead to significant societal changes as the printing press had.
The specific indication of uncertainty by the author is reflected in their mention of the hope that the iPhone, and the Internet in general, would liberate people in closed societies. However, the mentioned continued suppression of ideas in countries like North Korea, China, and Iran challenges that hope, leading to the conclusion that the correct answer is "The continued suppression of free speech in closed societies."
The author attributes the French and American revolutions to the invention of the printing press due to its role in the rapid spread of information. The printing press allowed for the dissemination of new ideas concerning freedom and democracy, which were crucial in inspiring revolutionary thoughts and actions.
The comprehension passage highlights the impact the printing press had on society, comparing it to the effect of the iPhone in modern times. The press significantly increased the production of written material, enabling more people to access information and ideas that were previously confined by the limited production capabilities of handwritten books.
Furthermore, the text suggests that the presence of "enlightened voices in print" was instrumental in the intellectual environment necessary for the revolutions, as it broke the monopoly on knowledge once held by religious clerics and made revolutionary ideas available to a broader audience. This aligns with the chosen answer because it emphasizes the fundamental role of information dissemination in fostering the revolutionary movements in France and America.
Thus, the correct reason why the author attributes the revolutions to the printing press is, "the rapid spread of information exposed people to new ideas on freedom and democracy."
The passage contrasts the impact of the smartphone, specifically the iPhone, with that of the Gutenberg printing press. The author explores how each technology influenced society and whether the smartphone can match the historical significance of the printing press.
Key Points from the Passage:
Conclusion Based on the Passage:
The smartphone, symbolized by the iPhone, has "so far not proved as successful as the printing press in opening people's minds." This conclusion aligns with the author's exploration of the smartphone's impact compared to the profound societal changes initiated by the printing press.
Former Governor of a State and National Democratic Alliance (NDA) candidate Droupadi Murmu was elected the 15th President of India, the first tribal woman to be elected to the position and the youngest as well. She was declared elected on Thursday after four rounds of counting, although she had crossed the half-way mark after the third round of counting itself, posting an unassailable lead over her rival and the Opposition’s candidate who conceded the election thereafter. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the first to greet Ms. Murmu at her residence in New Delhi after the third round of counting showed that she had crossed the half-way mark. Ms. Murmu hails from the Santhal tribe and was born in the district of Mayurbhanj, coming up the hard way in life, graduating and teaching in Odisha before entering electoral politics at the local body level and later being elected MLA and serving as a Minister in the Biju Janata Dal-BJP coalition government from 2000 to 2004. She remained an MLA till 2009, representing Rairangpur in Odisha, a town that burst into celebrations since her name was announced as a candidate for the post of President of India. She was known to intervene in stopping amendments to the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act that was being brought in by the BJP government of Raghubar Das, which involved changing land use in tribal areas.
“I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person,” wrote LaMDA in an “interview” conducted by engineer Blake Lemoine and one of his colleagues. ....Lemoine, a software engineer at Google, had been working on the development of LaMDA for months. His experience with the program, described in a recent Washington Post article, caused quite a stir. In the article, Lemoine recounts many dialogues he had with LaMDA in which the two talked about various topics, ranging from technical to philosophical issues. These led him to ask if the software program is sentient. In April, Lemoine explained his perspective in an internal company document, intended only for Google executives. But after his claims were dismissed, Lemoine went public with his work on this artificial intelligence algorithm—and Google placed him on administrative leave........Regardless of what LaMDA actually achieved, the issue of the difficult “measurability” of emulation capabilities expressed by machines also emerges. In the journal Mind in 1950, mathematician [1] proposed a test to determine whether a machine was capable of exhibiting intelligent behaviour, a game of imitation of some of the human cognitive functions. & nbsp;