Comprehension

I reported on the Iraq invasion as a “unilateral” journalist, which meant I rented an SUV from Hertz in Kuwait and sneaked across the border with the first US tanks. I wound up in Baghdad on April 9, 2003, and watched the Marines tear down the iconic statue of Saddam Hussein at Firdos Square. I returned to Iraq on several occasions to work on lengthy stories about the dismal turn of events as the occupation turned into a war of Americans against Iraqis, and Iraqis against Iraqis. The carnage, though heartbreaking, was almost the least shocking experience of my journeys between war in the Mideast and my home in New York City.
While Americans killed and got killed in Iraq, Americans back home shopped at Walmart and watched reality television. I had covered a lot of wars and thought I had grown accustomed to peaceful countries being unconcerned by other people’s quarrels. My unsentimental education had begun in the 1990s in Bosnia where I often had a Matrix-like experience. In the morning, I would wake up in Sarajevo or another cursed town that was blasted by bombs, frozen by winter and deprived of food. I would then begin my effort to get the hell out of hell. I would hope for a seat on what was known as Maybe Airlines. These were the UN relief flights that brought food into besieged Sarajevo. Maybe the shelling would be light enough for flights to land and take off, maybe not. If the flights were grounded, I could try to escape by driving along Sniper Alley and through a creepy no man’s land that constituted the only border that mattered in a nation cut and quartered by war. Distances are small in Europe. By the afternoon, I could be in Vienna or Budapest or London, enjoying the comfortable life that Europe offered many of its citizens: hot showers, good food, clean sheets, the certainty that I would not be killed by a mortar as I slept. I had a hard time believing these altered states existed in such close proximity. The contented Europeans eating apple strudel or shopping at Harrods on those 1990s afternoons– didn’t they realize war was being fought in their backyard? The answer was that they knew and didn’t care. Proximity isn’t destiny. Bosnia though close, wasn’t their home. Other people were killing and dying, not their people.
I had understood only half of it and learned the other half a decade later, on my return to America after sojourns in Iraq. Outside the tight-knit community of military families who cared deeply about the wars, nearly everyone in America went about his or her life as though Iraq and Afghanistan didn’t matter much. Nor had Americans been asked to change their way of life. It had become possible, I realized, for a nation to be at war without suffering the inconveniences associated with war– including the inconvenience of thinking about it.
World War II was a classic war in the sense of rationing, of drives for war bonds, of a draft the elite could not avoid with college deferments and of a ceaseless drumbeat in almost every sector of society that a great conflict was being fought that required great sacrifices of everyone. Even for families spared the loss of a loved one overseas, World War II was a visible– intentionally visible– aspect of life in the homeland; the nation’s leaders made it so. Life as it was before the war had to be suspended

Question: 1

Which of the following best states the author’s main point?

Show Hint

In main idea questions, prefer the choice that captures the author’s overall stance, not just a supporting detail.
Updated On: Jul 30, 2025
  • War is an existential issue.
  • War is not an exception to normal peacetime, but an enduring condition.
  • Wars do not bother people any more, even when waged on their behalf.
  • Wartime is the unpleasant and unwelcome partner of peacetime.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

To determine which statement best reflects the author's main point, we need to analyze the comprehension passage. The author discusses their experiences as a journalist during wars, notably in Iraq, and contrasts these experiences with life in peacetime areas such as New York and Europe. The key observation made by the author is the indifference shown by people in peaceful regions despite ongoing wars elsewhere. They note how individuals continue their everyday lives, unaffected and uninterested in the wars being fought.

The author reflects on this indifference through several personal experiences and illustrates the contrast between the devastation witnessed in war zones and the normalcy in non-warring countries. Historical context is provided with the example of World War II, where the entire society was engaged and aware due to the visible impacts and sacrifices required.

Given this context, the statement that best captures the author's main point is: Wars do not bother people any more, even when waged on their behalf. This choice aligns with the author's observations and reflections on modern society's detachment and lack of impact from wars, even when their country is involved.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

The phrase‘unsentimental education’ is used to:

Show Hint

Look at the sentence and nearby context to determine what an unusual phrase refers to in author’s tone and perspective.
Updated On: Jul 30, 2025
  • imply that there is no escape from the clutches of war.
  • disclose the shockingly indifferent attitude of people towards war.
  • point out that wars are no longer situated in historical context.
  • argue that the end of war is imminent.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The phrase ‘unsentimental education’ is used to disclose the shockingly indifferent attitude of people towards war. In the context provided, the author describes experiences covering wars and observing the stark contrast between war zones and peaceful places. While people in war-torn areas face devastation and danger, individuals in peaceful regions live normal lives, often indifferent to the conflicts occurring elsewhere. This indifference is illustrated by the author's observation of Americans continuing with daily activities like shopping and watching television, seemingly unaffected by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Similarly, during the Bosnian War, Europeans enjoyed normal life despite the war in neighboring areas. The ‘unsentimental education’ refers to the realization of this indifference and the ability of societies to remain unchanged and unconcerned about distant wars.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The author states “Proximity isn’t destiny” to suggest that:

Show Hint

When an author uses a metaphorical phrase, match it to the surrounding example for the intended implication.
Updated On: Jul 30, 2025
  • pushing the boundaries during military conflict is not a new experience for Europeans.
  • political discourse can be more important to public opinion than war itself.
  • Europeans would not give up their comforts because the neighbours are at war.
  • geographical boundaries are not predestined but wars are.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The statement “Proximity isn’t destiny” implies that physical closeness to a conflict does not necessarily impact one's lifestyle or concerns. In the context provided, the author observed that while war was occurring in nearby Bosnia, Europeans continued their daily routines without much change or concern. Similarly, the author noted that people in America went about their lives during the Iraq invasion, unaffected directly by the war. Thus, the correct interpretation is: Europeans would not give up their comforts because the neighbours are at war.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions