I reported on the Iraq invasion as a “unilateral” journalist, which meant I rented an SUV from Hertz in Kuwait and sneaked across the border with the first US tanks. I wound up in Baghdad on April 9, 2003, and watched the Marines tear down the iconic statue of Saddam Hussein at Firdos Square. I returned to Iraq on several occasions to work on lengthy stories about the dismal turn of events as the occupation turned into a war of Americans against Iraqis, and Iraqis against Iraqis. The carnage, though heartbreaking, was almost the least shocking experience of my journeys between war in the Mideast and my home in New York City.
While Americans killed and got killed in Iraq, Americans back home shopped at Walmart and watched reality television. I had covered a lot of wars and thought I had grown accustomed to peaceful countries being unconcerned by other people’s quarrels. My unsentimental education had begun in the 1990s in Bosnia where I often had a Matrix-like experience. In the morning, I would wake up in Sarajevo or another cursed town that was blasted by bombs, frozen by winter and deprived of food. I would then begin my effort to get the hell out of hell. I would hope for a seat on what was known as Maybe Airlines. These were the UN relief flights that brought food into besieged Sarajevo. Maybe the shelling would be light enough for flights to land and take off, maybe not. If the flights were grounded, I could try to escape by driving along Sniper Alley and through a creepy no man’s land that constituted the only border that mattered in a nation cut and quartered by war. Distances are small in Europe. By the afternoon, I could be in Vienna or Budapest or London, enjoying the comfortable life that Europe offered many of its citizens: hot showers, good food, clean sheets, the certainty that I would not be killed by a mortar as I slept. I had a hard time believing these altered states existed in such close proximity. The contented Europeans eating apple strudel or shopping at Harrods on those 1990s afternoons– didn’t they realize war was being fought in their backyard? The answer was that they knew and didn’t care. Proximity isn’t destiny. Bosnia though close, wasn’t their home. Other people were killing and dying, not their people.
I had understood only half of it and learned the other half a decade later, on my return to America after sojourns in Iraq. Outside the tight-knit community of military families who cared deeply about the wars, nearly everyone in America went about his or her life as though Iraq and Afghanistan didn’t matter much. Nor had Americans been asked to change their way of life. It had become possible, I realized, for a nation to be at war without suffering the inconveniences associated with war– including the inconvenience of thinking about it.
World War II was a classic war in the sense of rationing, of drives for war bonds, of a draft the elite could not avoid with college deferments and of a ceaseless drumbeat in almost every sector of society that a great conflict was being fought that required great sacrifices of everyone. Even for families spared the loss of a loved one overseas, World War II was a visible– intentionally visible– aspect of life in the homeland; the nation’s leaders made it so. Life as it was before the war had to be suspended
To determine which statement best reflects the author's main point, we need to analyze the comprehension passage. The author discusses their experiences as a journalist during wars, notably in Iraq, and contrasts these experiences with life in peacetime areas such as New York and Europe. The key observation made by the author is the indifference shown by people in peaceful regions despite ongoing wars elsewhere. They note how individuals continue their everyday lives, unaffected and uninterested in the wars being fought.
The author reflects on this indifference through several personal experiences and illustrates the contrast between the devastation witnessed in war zones and the normalcy in non-warring countries. Historical context is provided with the example of World War II, where the entire society was engaged and aware due to the visible impacts and sacrifices required.
Given this context, the statement that best captures the author's main point is: Wars do not bother people any more, even when waged on their behalf. This choice aligns with the author's observations and reflections on modern society's detachment and lack of impact from wars, even when their country is involved.
The author states “Proximity isn’t destiny” to suggest that:
The statement “Proximity isn’t destiny” implies that physical closeness to a conflict does not necessarily impact one's lifestyle or concerns. In the context provided, the author observed that while war was occurring in nearby Bosnia, Europeans continued their daily routines without much change or concern. Similarly, the author noted that people in America went about their lives during the Iraq invasion, unaffected directly by the war. Thus, the correct interpretation is: Europeans would not give up their comforts because the neighbours are at war.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."