Step 1: Prognostication Differences Between a 1-Year-Old and 3-Year-Old with Infantile Esotropia.
Prognosis for children with infantile esotropia depends on the timing of intervention, the severity of the condition, and the presence of amblyopia. The prognosis differs between a 1-year-old and a 3-year-old child due to the following factors:
(1) Age of Intervention:
- 1-Year-Old Child: Early intervention in children under 2 years of age, ideally before 12 months, offers the best chance for successful correction. Younger children have better neural plasticity, which improves the likelihood of recovering binocular vision and stereopsis after surgical alignment.
- 3-Year-Old Child: At 3 years, the neural pathways related to binocular vision may be less flexible. While surgery can still align the eyes, the child may have a lower chance of regaining full stereopsis and normal depth perception. The risk of persistent amblyopia is also higher in older children if the esotropia has been present for longer periods.
(2) Development of Amblyopia:
- 1-Year-Old Child: If intervention is early, the risk of amblyopia is reduced as the brain has a better capacity to adapt to the corrected alignment and compensate for the misalignment.
- 3-Year-Old Child: Amblyopia is more likely to develop in a 3-year-old, especially if the esotropia has been present for an extended period. The longer the misalignment persists, the more likely the child will develop a lazy eye and lose vision in the misaligned eye.
(3) Visual Function and Eye Alignment Post-Surgery:
- 1-Year-Old Child: The prognosis for postoperative vision and eye alignment is better in younger children. Early surgery often leads to better alignment and visual outcomes.
- 3-Year-Old Child: Older children may experience partial recovery of alignment, but full recovery of binocular vision or stereopsis is less likely, especially if amblyopia has already developed.