Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to identify the characteristics that contribute to the efficiency of honey bees as pollinators.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's evaluate each character:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(A): This statement is false. Honey bees have bodies covered in branched, electrostatic hairs (plumose hairs) that are specifically adapted to trap pollen grains. A smooth, waxy body would be inefficient at picking up pollen. } \\ \bullet & \text{(B): This statement is true. Honey bees (genus *Apis*) are found across the globe and can survive in a wide range of climates, from tropical to temperate, making them reliable pollinators in diverse ecosystems. } \\ \bullet & \text{(C): This statement is true. The proboscis (tongue) of a honey bee is of a length that allows it to access nectar from a wide variety of flowers, making it a generalist pollinator for many different crops. } \\ \bullet & \text{(D): This statement is true. Honey bees have several modifications for pollen collection, most notably the corbicula, or "pollen basket," a polished cavity on the outer hind tibia fringed with long hairs, where they pack pollen for transport. } \\ \end{array}\]
The correct statements that describe why honey bees are efficient pollinators are (B), (C), and (D).
Step 3: Final Answer:
The correct combination of characters is (B), (C), and (D).
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |