Step 1: Understanding the argument.
The argument is based on the assumption that if the Arctic warms, guillemots will extend their range northward. However, if their predators can also extend their range, this could counterbalance the expansion of the guillemots’ range.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This does not weaken the argument significantly, as it only suggests that snow may still impact the guillemots, but it doesn’t address the expansion of their range.
- (B) This is the correct answer. If guillemots’ predators can extend their range as well, it would reduce the effectiveness of the guillemots’ range expansion, making this a serious counterpoint to the argument.
- (C) This fact is not directly relevant to whether the guillemots’ range will expand.
- (D) The disappearance of thin ice does not directly undermine the argument about range expansion; it might only limit the guillemots' habitat in certain areas.
- (E) This introduces a potential issue for the guillemots but doesn’t directly address the northward range expansion.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (B), as it introduces a competing factor that could prevent the guillemots’ range from expanding northward.