Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R:
Assertion A: If the production volume in unit is 10,000 unit and total sales units are 5000. Selling price per unit ₹12, variable cost per unit ₹ 6 and the fixed cost per year is ₹ 40,000. In this case, the Absorption costing shows more profit than variable costing.
Reason R: The variable costing considered full cost for product costing and Inventory valuations.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Assertion A: If the production volume in unit is 10,000 unit and total sales units are 5000. Selling price per unit ₹12, variable cost per unit ₹ 6 and the fixed cost per year is ₹ 40,000. In this case, the Absorption costing shows more profit than variable costing.
Reason R: The variable costing considered full cost for product costing and Inventory valuations.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
- Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
- A is correct but R is not correct
- A is not correct but R is correct
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
Top Questions on Statements and Assumptions
Aarya had always been a mediocre student. Luckily, after finishing her undergraduate degree from a tier-two engineering college, she secured a decent but modestly paying job at a reputable IT company.
However, after a year on the job, Aarya found her role mundane. When her best friend at the company, Shruti, left to pursue an MBA from a top-tier business school, citing significant career growth and potential salary increase upon graduation, Aarya felt intrigued and inspired to follow the same path. Shruti appreciated Aarya’s aspirations, telling her that doing an MBA from a top-tier business school could not only land Aarya a lucrative job but also it could fast-track her career progression. However, Aarya was concerned whether she would be able to balance between her MBA entrance exam preparation and her current job. Aarya considered resigning to focus entirely on MBA entrance exam preparation, but Shruti cautioned her that top-tier business schools might view a career break unfavourably, as they prefer continuous professional engagement.- XAT - 2025
- Decision Making
- Statements and Assumptions
- Statement: The government should provide free laptops to university students.
Assumption I: Laptops are essential for modern education.
Assumption II: All students can't afford laptops on their own.- CUET (UG) - 2025
- General Aptitude
- Statements and Assumptions
Statement: All poets are sensitive people. Some sensitive people are not artists.
Conclusion I: Some poets are not artists.
Conclusion II: Some sensitive people may be poets.
Choose the correct option:- CUET (UG) - 2025
- English
- Statements and Assumptions
All poets are dreamers.
Some dreamers are not realists.
Therefore, which of the following must be true?- CUET (UG) - 2025
- English
- Statements and Assumptions
- Statement: The government should reduce the tax on electric vehicles to promote green transportation.
Assumption I: High taxes discourage people from buying electric vehicles.
Assumption II: Reducing tax alone is enough to boost green transportation.- CUET (UG) - 2025
- General Aptitude
- Statements and Assumptions
Questions Asked in CUET PG exam
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Contract Law
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Judicial Process
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Indian Constitution
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Administrative Law