Step 1: Analyzing the Statements.
We are given the following statements:
- Statement 1: All mammals are fish.
- Statement 2: All fish are dolphins.
Step 2: Evaluating the Conclusions.
Let’s evaluate each conclusion based on the two statements:
- (a) Some of the fish are mammals: According to Statement 1, all mammals are fish. Hence, this conclusion is true because the fish that are mammals would exist.
- (b) None of the dolphins are mammals: Statement 2 says that all fish are dolphins, but since all mammals are fish, this implies that all mammals are dolphins, which contradicts this conclusion.
- (c) Some of the mammals are dolphins: This is correct because all mammals are fish, and all fish are dolphins (from the statements), so some mammals must be dolphins.
- (d) All mammals are dolphins: This conclusion is too strong. While some mammals are dolphins, we cannot conclusively say all mammals are dolphins based on the given information.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct conclusion is (c), as it is logically valid based on the given statements.
\[
\boxed{\text{The correct answer is (c) Some of the mammals are dolphins.}}
\]