The statement is true because Gandhiji's approach to the 'Quit India Movement' was centered around uniting all Indians, regardless of their caste, religion, or social status, to fight for a common cause: the removal of British colonial rule. His leadership aimed to forge a sense of national unity through the following arguments:
1. Call for Mass Mobilization: Gandhiji called for the active participation of every Indian in the 'Quit India Movement', irrespective of their background. His slogan “Do or Die” inspired millions across the country to take part in the struggle for independence. By emphasizing the collective action of the masses, he aimed to create a united front against British rule. His call resonated with people from all walks of life, from urban intellectuals to rural peasants.
2. Inclusivity Across Social Divides: Gandhiji emphasized the need for social and religious unity among Indians. In the context of the 'Quit India Movement', he made efforts to bring together various sections of Indian society, including Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, and other communities, to fight for the common goal of independence. He sought to bridge the divide between the different social groups and urged them to unite under the banner of nationalism.
3. Emphasis on Non-Violence and Cooperation: Gandhiji’s insistence on non-violence (Ahimsa) during the Quit India Movement played a key role in bringing together Indians from different regions and social groups. His philosophy of peaceful resistance encouraged people to work together, not through violence, but through mass protests, strikes, and civil disobedience. This fostered a sense of solidarity and national unity, even in the face of British repression.
4. Focus on Economic Self-Reliance: Gandhiji’s vision of Swadeshi (self-reliance) and the boycott of foreign goods during the Quit India Movement promoted economic independence alongside political freedom. This aspect of the movement aimed at breaking the economic shackles of British rule, appealing to all Indians, particularly those involved in small industries and rural communities. His emphasis on making India self-reliant created a collective purpose for economic upliftment, which was vital for national unity.
5. Symbol of National Identity: Through the 'Quit India Movement', Gandhiji transformed the struggle for independence into a mass movement that went beyond political ideology. The movement became a symbol of national identity, transcending regional and linguistic differences. His leadership in uniting the masses under one cause helped cultivate a sense of belonging to a unified nation rather than isolated regions.
6. Inspiration for Future Generations: Gandhiji’s emphasis on national unity during the Quit India Movement laid the foundation for future generations to continue the fight for freedom. His approach helped young and old, rich and poor, urban and rural populations see themselves as part of a larger national effort, fostering unity and dedication to the cause of independence.
Identify the leader of the Indian National Movement in 1905 with the help of the given information.
The Anguish of the King
When the king Devanampiya Piyadassi had been ruling for eight years, the (country of the) Kalingas (present-day coastal Orissa) was conquered by (him). One hundred and fifty thousand men were deported, a hundred thousand were killed, and many more died.
After that, now that (the country of) the Kalingas has been taken, Devanampiya (is devoted) to an intense study of Dhamma, to the love of Dhamma, and to instructing (the people) in Dhamma.
This is the repentance of Devanampiya on account of his conquest of the (country of the) Kalingas.
For this is considered very painful and deplorable by Devanampiya that, while one is conquering an unconquered (country) slaughter, death and deportation of people (take place) there...
Declining a Royal Gift
This excerpt from a sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313 : I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) had the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet ... At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master ... had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands ? ... None of our ... spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”
Then he told an appropriate story: “... Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (sufis), and the land for his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: ‘Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.’”
What taluqdars thought
The attitude of the taluqdars was best expressed by Hanwant Singh, the Raja of Kalakankar, near Rae Bareli. During the mutiny, Hanwant Singh had given shelter to a British officer, and conveyed him to safety. While taking leave of the officer, Hanwant Singh told him:
Sahib, your countrymen came into this country and drove out our King. You sent your officers round the districts to examine the titles to the estates. At one blow you took from me lands which from time immemorial had been in my family. I submitted. Suddenly misfortune fell upon you. The people of the land rose against you. You came to me whom you had despoiled. I have saved you. But now – now I march at the head of my retainers to Lucknow to try and drive you from the country.