Question:
Frustration of contract is provided by which section of the India contract Act?
Frustration of contract is provided by which section of the India contract Act?
Show Hint
Frustration of Contract = Supervening Impossibility = Section 56. This is when an external, unforeseen event makes performing the contract impossible, thereby ending the contract.
Updated On: Nov 5, 2025
- Sec. 73
- Sec. 70
- Sec. 2(d)
- Sec. 56
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
The doctrine of frustration of contract, also known as supervening impossibility, is embodied in Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The second paragraph of this section states: "A contract to do an act which, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some event which the promisor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes impossible or unlawful." This means that if the performance of a contract becomes impossible due to an unforeseen event beyond the control of the parties, the contract is discharged. The other sections are unrelated: S.73 deals with damages for breach, S.70 with quasi-contract, and S.2(d) defines consideration.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Contract Law
- Distinction between the ‘sale’ and ‘agreement to sell’ is necessary to determine
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Contract Law
- Under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 a court can enforce specific performance of a contract when ____.
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Contract Law
- A suit for ‘rectification of instruments’ can be filed under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 when instrument ____.
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Contract Law
- The remedy of ‘rescission of a contract’ is available under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 when the contract is ____.
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Contract Law
- The standard of care to be taken by a bailee for the goods bailed is same as
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Contract Law
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the rule of nemo judex in causa sua is subject to the doctrine of necessity?
- AIBE - 2025
- Administrative Law
- According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?
- AIBE - 2025
- General Law
- The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
Select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2025
- Family Laws
- Statement 1: Under the Indian Penal Code, if a person harbours an offender who has escaped custody for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years, he shall be punished with imprisonment up to 7 years.
Statement 2: The law provides an exception for harbouring or concealing by the husband or wife of the offender.- AIBE - 2025
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- A Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II.
Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the Government credits ₹15,000 to the Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom fine has been recovered from the employer. This amount may be deposited or invested, and the interest is also payable to the child or adolescent.
Conclusions:
I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it.
II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer.
Which one is correct?- AIBE - 2025
- Labour & Industrial Law
View More Questions