the notion of folk has led to several debates and disagreements.
To understand why the author says that folk "may often appear a cosy, fossilised form," we must examine the context provided in the comprehension passage. The passage describes various aspects of folk music and its associations:
This context supports the correct answer option, which states:
of its nostalgic association with a pre-industrial past.
Thus, the passage suggests that folk appears fossilised because it evokes a romanticized view of an earlier, simpler time, often associated with the aesthetics of the past.
that British folk continues to have traces of pagan influence from the dark ages.
the fluidity of folk forms owing to their history of oral mode of transmission.
The question asks us to identify which option does not contribute to the plurality and diversity within the British folk tradition. Let’s analyze each option in the context of the given comprehension:
Option 1: Paradoxically, folk forms are both popular and unpopular.
This statement discusses the dual perception of British folk forms in contemporary times, not directly influencing its plurality or diversity. Instead, it highlights folk's simultaneous relevance and irrelevance, which does not contribute to the origin or diversity of folk forms.
Option 2: That British folk continues to have traces of pagan influence from the dark ages.
The text mentions folk containing a "whiff of Britain's heathen dark ages," indicating a historical influence that adds to its diversity by retaining elements from different eras.
Option 3: That British folk forms can be traced to the remote past of the country.
The passage suggests that folk traditions are deeply rooted in history, having evolved over time. This historical depth contributes to its diversity.
Option 4: The fluidity of folk forms owing to their history of oral mode of transmission.
The passage notes that folk songs are in constant transformation, suggesting that their fluid oral history contributes significantly to the diversity and plurality of the tradition.
Based on the analysis, Option 1 is the correct answer, as it reflects a contemporary paradox of popularity rather than a cause for historical plurality and diversity.
To determine which view the author is least likely to agree with, we need to analyze the given passage about folk forms. The passage discusses how folk forms are deeply tied to their roots while simultaneously being dynamic, evolving with each rendition and cultural influence. It conveys the idea of folk as an adaptive entity that remains relevant and influential over time, free from being static or overly homogeneous. Let's examine each option:
1. The power of folk resides in its contradictory ability to influence and be influenced by the present while remaining rooted in the past.
This statement aligns with the passage's notion that folk forms balance modern influences while staying connected to their historical origins.
2. Folk forms, despite their archaic origins, remain intellectually relevant in contemporary times.
The passage supports this by describing folk's enduring influence on modern music, design, and fashion.
3. Folk forms, in their ability to constantly adapt to the changing world, exhibit an unusual poise and homogeneity with each change.
The passage emphasizes transformation and diversity in folk adaptations rather than homogeneity. This is evident when describing how different eras and influences have reshaped folk forms.
4. The plurality and democratizing impulse of folk forms emanate from the improvisation that its practitioners bring to it.
This view is consistent with the passage, highlighting folk's evolving nature driven by creativity and improvisation.
Upon analysis, option 3 is the least aligned with the author's views. The passage suggests that while folk forms adapt and change, they do not do so with homogeneity; rather, they reflect a variety of influences and transformations. Therefore, the author is least likely to agree with the statement that folk forms exhibit an unusual poise and homogeneity with each change.
the pervasive influence of folk on contemporary art, culture, and fashion.
that what is once regarded as radical in folk, can later be seen as conformist.
The passage explores the evolving meaning and reception of the concept of "folk"—initially viewed as radical and anti-capitalist, but later becoming associated with mainstream and even conservative values.
The mention of William Morris and his floral prints serves as a metaphor for how ideas and expressions that begin as revolutionary or countercultural can, over time, become normalized and assimilated into the mainstream.
"Morris’s floral designs were once effusive and revolutionary, but now adorn genteel sofas."
This transformation symbolizes how folk traditions, initially representing resistance to industrial capitalism, can gradually lose their radical edge and become decorative or traditional—no longer challenging the status quo, but reinforcing it.
The reference is used to illustrate the core argument of the passage: that what begins as radical and subversive can become conventional and conformist through time and cultural adaptation.
The primary purpose of the reference to William Morris’s floral prints is to show that what was once radical in folk tradition can later become conformist and mainstream.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?