the notion of folk has led to several debates and disagreements.
To understand why the author says that folk "may often appear a cosy, fossilised form," we must examine the context provided in the comprehension passage. The passage describes various aspects of folk music and its associations:
This context supports the correct answer option, which states:
of its nostalgic association with a pre-industrial past.
Thus, the passage suggests that folk appears fossilised because it evokes a romanticized view of an earlier, simpler time, often associated with the aesthetics of the past.
that British folk continues to have traces of pagan influence from the dark ages.
the fluidity of folk forms owing to their history of oral mode of transmission.
The question asks us to identify which option does not contribute to the plurality and diversity within the British folk tradition. Let’s analyze each option in the context of the given comprehension:
Option 1: Paradoxically, folk forms are both popular and unpopular.
This statement discusses the dual perception of British folk forms in contemporary times, not directly influencing its plurality or diversity. Instead, it highlights folk's simultaneous relevance and irrelevance, which does not contribute to the origin or diversity of folk forms.
Option 2: That British folk continues to have traces of pagan influence from the dark ages.
The text mentions folk containing a "whiff of Britain's heathen dark ages," indicating a historical influence that adds to its diversity by retaining elements from different eras.
Option 3: That British folk forms can be traced to the remote past of the country.
The passage suggests that folk traditions are deeply rooted in history, having evolved over time. This historical depth contributes to its diversity.
Option 4: The fluidity of folk forms owing to their history of oral mode of transmission.
The passage notes that folk songs are in constant transformation, suggesting that their fluid oral history contributes significantly to the diversity and plurality of the tradition.
Based on the analysis, Option 1 is the correct answer, as it reflects a contemporary paradox of popularity rather than a cause for historical plurality and diversity.
To determine which view the author is least likely to agree with, we need to analyze the given passage about folk forms. The passage discusses how folk forms are deeply tied to their roots while simultaneously being dynamic, evolving with each rendition and cultural influence. It conveys the idea of folk as an adaptive entity that remains relevant and influential over time, free from being static or overly homogeneous. Let's examine each option:
1. The power of folk resides in its contradictory ability to influence and be influenced by the present while remaining rooted in the past.
This statement aligns with the passage's notion that folk forms balance modern influences while staying connected to their historical origins.
2. Folk forms, despite their archaic origins, remain intellectually relevant in contemporary times.
The passage supports this by describing folk's enduring influence on modern music, design, and fashion.
3. Folk forms, in their ability to constantly adapt to the changing world, exhibit an unusual poise and homogeneity with each change.
The passage emphasizes transformation and diversity in folk adaptations rather than homogeneity. This is evident when describing how different eras and influences have reshaped folk forms.
4. The plurality and democratizing impulse of folk forms emanate from the improvisation that its practitioners bring to it.
This view is consistent with the passage, highlighting folk's evolving nature driven by creativity and improvisation.
Upon analysis, option 3 is the least aligned with the author's views. The passage suggests that while folk forms adapt and change, they do not do so with homogeneity; rather, they reflect a variety of influences and transformations. Therefore, the author is least likely to agree with the statement that folk forms exhibit an unusual poise and homogeneity with each change.
the pervasive influence of folk on contemporary art, culture, and fashion.
that what is once regarded as radical in folk, can later be seen as conformist.
The passage explores the evolving meaning and reception of the concept of "folk"—initially viewed as radical and anti-capitalist, but later becoming associated with mainstream and even conservative values.
The mention of William Morris and his floral prints serves as a metaphor for how ideas and expressions that begin as revolutionary or countercultural can, over time, become normalized and assimilated into the mainstream.
"Morris’s floral designs were once effusive and revolutionary, but now adorn genteel sofas."
This transformation symbolizes how folk traditions, initially representing resistance to industrial capitalism, can gradually lose their radical edge and become decorative or traditional—no longer challenging the status quo, but reinforcing it.
The reference is used to illustrate the core argument of the passage: that what begins as radical and subversive can become conventional and conformist through time and cultural adaptation.
The primary purpose of the reference to William Morris’s floral prints is to show that what was once radical in folk tradition can later become conformist and mainstream.
Former Governor of a State and National Democratic Alliance (NDA) candidate Droupadi Murmu was elected the 15th President of India, the first tribal woman to be elected to the position and the youngest as well. She was declared elected on Thursday after four rounds of counting, although she had crossed the half-way mark after the third round of counting itself, posting an unassailable lead over her rival and the Opposition’s candidate who conceded the election thereafter. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the first to greet Ms. Murmu at her residence in New Delhi after the third round of counting showed that she had crossed the half-way mark. Ms. Murmu hails from the Santhal tribe and was born in the district of Mayurbhanj, coming up the hard way in life, graduating and teaching in Odisha before entering electoral politics at the local body level and later being elected MLA and serving as a Minister in the Biju Janata Dal-BJP coalition government from 2000 to 2004. She remained an MLA till 2009, representing Rairangpur in Odisha, a town that burst into celebrations since her name was announced as a candidate for the post of President of India. She was known to intervene in stopping amendments to the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act that was being brought in by the BJP government of Raghubar Das, which involved changing land use in tribal areas.
“I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person,” wrote LaMDA in an “interview” conducted by engineer Blake Lemoine and one of his colleagues. ....Lemoine, a software engineer at Google, had been working on the development of LaMDA for months. His experience with the program, described in a recent Washington Post article, caused quite a stir. In the article, Lemoine recounts many dialogues he had with LaMDA in which the two talked about various topics, ranging from technical to philosophical issues. These led him to ask if the software program is sentient. In April, Lemoine explained his perspective in an internal company document, intended only for Google executives. But after his claims were dismissed, Lemoine went public with his work on this artificial intelligence algorithm—and Google placed him on administrative leave........Regardless of what LaMDA actually achieved, the issue of the difficult “measurability” of emulation capabilities expressed by machines also emerges. In the journal Mind in 1950, mathematician [1] proposed a test to determine whether a machine was capable of exhibiting intelligent behaviour, a game of imitation of some of the human cognitive functions. & nbsp;