Step 1: Create a table to organize the information.
Let's make a table with columns for Friend, City, and Company.
| Friend | City | Company |
|--------|---------|---------|
| A | | |
| B | | |
| C | Indore | |
| D | | |
Step 2: Fill in the table with direct and deductive information.
1. C went to Indore. (Directly given)
2. RR conducted its interview in Nagpur. This means the person who went to Nagpur was interviewed by RR.
3. A did not go to Nagpur. (Given)
4. Since C is in Indore and A is not in Nagpur, and the person in Nagpur works for RR, A was not invited by RR.
5. B did not go to Gurugram. (Given)
6. A was not invited by PP or SS. (Given)
7. B was not invited by RR or PP. (Given)
Step 3: Deduce the person who went to Nagpur.
The cities are Indore, Noida, Gurugram, Nagpur. C is in Indore. A is not in Nagpur. Let's see who could be in Nagpur. The person in Nagpur works for RR. B was not invited by RR, so B did not go to Nagpur.
Therefore, by elimination (D must have gone to Nagpur). And D's company is RR.
Step 4: Deduce the companies for A, B, and C.
- D's company is RR.
- Companies left: PP, QQ, SS.
- A was not invited by PP or SS. So, A's company must be QQ.
- B was not invited by PP or RR. RR is taken by D. So B was not invited by PP.
- Companies left for B and C are PP and SS. Since B was not invited by PP, B's company must be SS.
- By elimination, C's company must be PP.
Step 5: Deduce the remaining cities.
- C is in Indore. D is in Nagpur.
- Cities left for A and B are Noida and Gurugram.
- B did not go to Gurugram. Therefore, B must have gone to Noida.
- By elimination, A must have gone to Gurugram.
Final Table:
| Friend | City | Company |
|--------|----------|---------|
| A | Gurugram | QQ |
| B | Noida | SS |
| C | Indore | PP |
| D | Nagpur | RR |
Answer to Q39: C's interview was scheduled in company PP.
Answer to Q40: D went to Nagpur.