Comprehension

For private goods, competitive markets ensure efficiency despite the decentralized nature of the information about individual’s tastes and firm technologies. Implicitly, market competition solved adverse selection problems and the fixed-price contracts associated with exogenous prices solve moral hazard problems. However, markets fail for pure public goods and public intervention is thus needed. In this case, the mechanisms used for those collective decisions must solve the incentive problem of acquiring the private information that agents have about their references for public goods. Voting mechanisms are particular incentive mechanisms without any monetary transfers for which the same question of strategic voting, i.e., not voting according to the true preferences, can be raised. For private goods, increasing returns to scale create a situation of natural monopoly far away from the world of competitive markets. When the monopoly has private information about its cost or demand, its regulation by a regulatory commission becomes a principal-agent problem.
Note: Public goods are those in which individuals cannot be excluded from use and where use by one individual does not reduce availability to others, while an individual can be excluded in case of private goods.

Question: 1

For which of the following goods, can markets not be efficient?

Show Hint

Remember: Public goods (non-excludable and non-rivalrous) like \textbf{air, national defense, public parks} are where markets fail. Efficient allocation usually requires government intervention.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • Packaged water
  • Electricity supply at home
  • Air
  • Petrol
  • All of the above
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Markets function efficiently when goods are excludable (buyers can be prevented from consuming without payment) and rivalrous (one person’s consumption reduces availability for others).
Packaged water is excludable and rivalrous, so it can be efficiently allocated through markets.
Electricity supply at home can be priced and supplied efficiently by regulated markets.
Petrol is also sold through markets and is both excludable and rivalrous.
Air, however, is a public good. It is non-excludable (nobody can be prevented from breathing it) and non-rivalrous (one person’s use does not diminish another’s). Because of this, markets cannot allocate it efficiently — leading to issues like pollution (negative externality). Thus, the correct answer is: \[ \boxed{\text{Air}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following cannot be concluded from the above paragraph?

Show Hint

Be cautious with extreme statements like "panacea." In economics, solutions are often conditional or context-dependent, and a blanket solution like public intervention is rarely explicitly supported.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • Public intervention is the panacea when market fails.
  • Adverse selection problems as well as moral hazard problems may not arise in competitive markets.
  • Strategic voting is nothing but a non-monetary incentive mechanism.
  • Lack of access to private information regarding preferences of agent leads to incentive problem.
  • Public regulations may address problems associated with natural monopoly.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

- The paragraph does not directly state that public intervention is the absolute solution to market failures, hence option (A) cannot be conclusively derived from the text.
- Other options, such as (B), (C), (D), and (E), all align with possible inferences or common discussions related to market and economic problems.
\[ \boxed{\text{Option A is not concluded.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Read the following statements carefully:
Statement 1: In India factories dump their waste in the nearby water bodies.
Statement 2: Government is thinking of granting tax benefits to factories which adopt eco–friendly practices.
Which of the following options best captures the relationships between Statement 1 and Statement 2?

Show Hint

When pollution or environmental harm occurs due to unregulated industry, it is a \textbf{market failure}. Corrective government policies like taxes, subsidies, or regulations aim to fix such externalities.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • Statement 1 is an example of market failure and Statement 2 corroborates Statement 1.
  • Statement 1 is an example of ‘adverse selection problem’ and Statement 2 is an example of ‘moral hazard problem’.
  • Statement 1 is an example of market failure while Statement 2 suggests one way of reducing the problem.
  • Statement 1 is an example of public good and Statement 2 is an example of private good.
  • In Statement 1 the principal is ‘factory’ and in Statement 2 the principal is ‘government’.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Statement 1: Factories dumping waste in nearby water bodies is a classic case of market failure, where negative externalities (pollution) are not accounted for in market transactions.
Statement 2: The government proposes tax benefits for eco-friendly practices, which is an intervention designed to internalize externalities and reduce the problem of pollution.
- Option A: Incorrect — Statement 2 does not corroborate Statement 1; rather, it suggests a solution.
- Option B: Incorrect — adverse selection and moral hazard do not apply here.
- Option C: Correct — this precisely captures the relationship.
- Option D: Incorrect — this is not about public vs. private goods.
- Option E: Incorrect — principal-agent terminology does not apply here.
\[ \boxed{\text{Statement 1 shows market failure, Statement 2 suggests a corrective measure.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions