Step 1: Recall resolution formula.
The resolution limit of a microscope is approximately:
\[
d \approx \frac{0.61 \lambda}{n \sin\theta} = \frac{0.61 \lambda}{NA}
\]
where:
- \(\lambda\) = wavelength of light,
- \(n\) = refractive index of medium,
- \(\theta\) = half-angle of light cone,
- \(NA = n \sin \theta\) = numerical aperture.
Step 2: Effect of wavelength.
If \(\lambda\) decreases, the denominator is unchanged but numerator decreases, so:
\[
d \downarrow \Rightarrow \text{Resolution improves.}
\]
Thus, statement (A) is correct.
Step 3: Effect of refractive index.
If refractive index \(n\) decreases, \(NA = n \sin \theta\) decreases, hence denominator decreases. This makes \(d\) increase, i.e. resolution worsens.
So, resolution limit actually increases with decreasing refractive index.
Thus, (B) is incorrect.
Step 4: Effect of numerical aperture on depth of field.
Depth of field (DOF) is approximately:
\[
DOF \propto \frac{1}{NA^2}
\]
So if numerical aperture increases, DOF decreases.
Thus, (C) is correct.
Step 5: Effect of numerical aperture on resolution.
From formula: \(d \propto \frac{1}{NA}\).
If numerical aperture increases, resolution limit decreases (better resolution).
Thus, (D) is correct.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{(A), (C), (D)}
\]