To solve this problem, let's analyze the given details and evaluate each option to determine which must be true.
**Given Information:**
**Calculating Total Marks:**
The average of the five students is 40. This means the total marks obtained by these students is:
\(Total\ Marks = 5 \times 40 = 200\)
Since none of them scored exactly 40, we need to investigate the distribution of their marks under this total. Since each student must score more than 10, assume marks of students are \(a, b, c, d, e\) such that \(a + b + c + d + e = 200\) and none of these are 40.
**Evaluating the Options:**
Let's verify each of these options:
For the average to be 40 without anyone scoring it exactly, combining scores greater and less than 40 is necessary. To balance higher scores, at least one lower score is required.
Thus, the correct answer is: At least, one of them scored less than 40 marks.
The average mark obtained by the five students is 40. This implies that the total sum of their marks is 40 * 5 = 200. We need to determine which option must be true based on the given information.
We have the following conditions:
Let's analyze the options one by one:
| Option | Analysis |
| At least, three of them scored a maximum of 40 marks | None of them scored exactly 40 marks, so this option isn't valid. |
| At least, three of them scored more than 40 marks | Let's assume three students scored more than 40. If so, then two would score less than 40. It does not consider average, so this isn't a must. |
| At least, one of them scored exactly 41 marks | This doesn't align with the given average unless adjusted by other exact values, not necessarily true. |
| At most, two of them scored more than 40 marks | This could still meet the requirements but isn't necessarily true given the flexibility. |
| At least, one of them scored less than 40 marks | If no student scored exactly 40, some would have to score below for the average to remain exactly 40. |
Conclusion: Given an average of 40 but none scored exactly 40, it's essential that at least one student scored less than 40 to balance scores otherwise above 40 so the correct option is that at least, one of them scored less than 40 marks.
Light Chemicals is an industrial paint supplier with presence in three locations: Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bengaluru. The sunburst chart below shows the distribution of the number of employees of different departments of Light Chemicals. There are four departments: Finance, IT, HR and Sales. The employees are deployed in four ranks: junior, mid, senior and executive. The chart shows four levels: location, department, rank and gender (M: male, F: female). At every level, the number of employees at a location/department/rank/gender are proportional to the corresponding area of the region represented in the chart.
Due to some issues with the software, the data on junior female employees have gone missing. Notice that there are junior female employees in Mumbai HR, Sales and IT departments, Hyderabad HR department, and Bengaluru IT and Finance departments. The corresponding missing numbers are marked u, v, w, x, y and z in the diagram, respectively.
It is also known that:
a) Light Chemicals has a total of 210 junior employees.
b) Light Chemicals has a total of 146 employees in the IT department.
c) Light Chemicals has a total of 777 employees in the Hyderabad office.
d) In the Mumbai office, the number of female employees is 55.

An investment company, Win Lose, recruit's employees to trade in the share market. For newcomers, they have a one-year probation period. During this period, the employees are given Rs. 1 lakh per month to invest the way they see fit. They are evaluated at the end of every month, using the following criteria:
1. If the total loss in any span of three consecutive months exceeds Rs. 20,000, their services are terminated at the end of that 3-month period,
2. If the total loss in any span of six consecutive months exceeds Rs. 10,000, their services are terminated at the end of that 6-month period.
Further, at the end of the 12-month probation period, if there are losses on their overall investment, their services are terminated.
Ratan, Shri, Tamal and Upanshu started working for Win Lose in January. Ratan was terminated after 4 months, Shri was terminated after 7 months, Tamal was terminated after 10 months, while Upanshu was not terminated even after 12 months. The table below, partially, lists their monthly profits (in Rs. ‘000’) over the 12-month period, where x, y and z are masked information.
Note:
• A negative profit value indicates a loss.
• The value in any cell is an integer.
Illustration: As Upanshu is continuing after March, that means his total profit during January-March (2z +2z +0) ≥
Rs.20,000. Similarly, as he is continuing after June, his total profit during January − June ≥
Rs.10,000, as well as his total profit during April-June ≥ Rs.10,000.