Step 1: Analyze the subject.
The subject is "Darwin's work," which is singular. Therefore, the verb must agree with the singular subject.
Step 2: Consider tense logic.
- Darwin's work is historical (in the past). So the first blank should be in the past tense $\Rightarrow$ (i) "had."
- The effect, however, continues to influence environmental politics in the present. So the second blank should be in the present tense $\Rightarrow$ (ii) "has."
Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options.
- (A) "have ... had": Incorrect, because "Darwin's work" is singular, so "have" is wrong.
- (B) "had ... have": Incorrect, because "have influenced" refers to the past, but the intended sense is present influence.
- (D) "has ... have": Incorrect, because both verbs in present tense do not fit the historical + continuing effect balance.
Step 4: Correct option.
Thus, the grammatically and contextually correct answer is:
\[
\boxed{(i)\ \text{had}, \ (ii)\ \text{has}}
\]