The passage highlights that Marshall Sahlins's primary intention when writing the essay was to serve as a mirror for an acquisitive society, which includes bourgeois individualism and contemporary economic life. The essay does this by giving instances of foraging societies that chose to prioritize values like freedom, mobility, and leisure over material possessions.
Sahlins compares the capitalist pursuit of wealth through material production and consumerism with the Zen path to affluence, which is attained by desiring less. As a result, Sahlins's objective—as stated in the passage—aligns with the notion of criticizing acquisitive societies by offering examples of communities that have successfully chosen non-materialistic paths. Thus, Option A is the correct answer.
Option B: Rather than claiming a progressive breakdown of society, the main focus is on exhibiting the values and choices of foraging societies.
Option C: Though Sahlins's essay criticizes parts of modern economic theories, its main goal is to illustrate alternatives through examples of non-materialistic civilizations, not to directly refute Galbraith's pessimistic viewpoint.
Option D: Sahlins's essay focuses more on drawing comparisons between foraging societies and modern economic life, even though it acknowledges the rise in inequality and social hierarchies brought about by the Neolithic Revolution.
So, the correct option is (A): hold a mirror to an acquisitive society, with examples of other communities that have chosen successfully to be non-materialistic.
The comprehension passage critically examines Sahlins's essay, "Original Affluent Society," highlighting several aspects of its content and impact over time. The review appreciates Sahlins's challenge to conventional economic thought, acknowledging hunter-gatherer societies' alternative to contemporary materialistic pursuits.
However, it also points out shortcomings, notably the inadequate emphasis on the consequences of racism and colonialism. This is evident in the passage's concluding remarks: "While acknowledging the violence of colonialism, racism, and dispossession, it does not thematize them as heavily as we might today," indicating the author's criticism of the essay's superficial engagement with these themes.
Based on this analysis, the critique centered on Sahlins's treatment of these issues aligns with the first option: cursory treatment of the effects of racism and colonialism on societies. Thus, this option is the correct answer.
The passage directly states that Sahlins's essay, "The Original Affluent Society," offered a critical viewpoint on modern consumerism and inequality, echoing similar themes found in John Kenneth Galbraith's work, "The Affluent Society." It highlights that Sahlins's essay compares the values of foraging societies with the capitalist drive for wealth, indicating a parallel with Galbraith's skeptical portrayal of postwar affluence and inequality. Consequently, Option C correctly represents the passage's discussion of the connection between Sahlins's perspective and Galbraith's critique of contemporary society.
Option B: The passage doesn't propose that Galbraith's theories contradict Sahlins's thesis, but rather emphasizes their compatibility.
Option D: The passage doesn't center on comparing the lifestyle of foragers with Galbraith's perspectives on modern development paths.
Option A: The passage doesn't detail the impact of Galbraith's views on Sahlins's analysis; rather, it underscores how Sahlins's essay complements Galbraith's critical stance on modern society.
Correct Option: (C) — Show how Sahlins's views complemented Galbraith's criticism of the consumerism and inequality of contemporary society.
Option C is the correct choice because the passage cites the Hadza community in Tanzania to demonstrate that forager societies, like the Hadza, don't fit into a straightforward narrative of human diversity or victimization. Instead, they actively make decisions about their lifestyle. The passage notes that despite living among farmers, the Hadza were aware of other options and deliberately chose to reject them. This example underscores that forager communities aren't limited by a lack of knowledge about alternatives; rather, their way of life stems from their own conscious decisions. Therefore, Option C accurately captures the essence of the Hadza example provided in the passage.
Option A: The passage doesn't particularly focus on the survival strategies of hunter-gatherer communities in modern times; instead, it highlights their decision-making processes and principles.
Option B: The passage doesn't address the Hadza community in relation to agricultural practices in nearby communities, rendering this option irrelevant to the example provided.
Option D: The passage doesn't indicate that the Hadza community lived alongside drastically different lifestyles and occupations for extended periods.
Correct Option: (C) — That forager communities' lifestyles derived not from ignorance about alternatives, but from their own choice.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."