Examine Bernier's opinion on the question of land ownership in Mughal India and how were the western economists influenced by Bernier's description?
Bernier's writings played a key role in shaping Western ideas about land ownership and its impact on economic development in India.
François Bernier, a French traveler who visited India during the Mughal Empire, wrote about his observations on land ownership in India in his book Travels in the Mughal Empire. His views on land ownership and the Mughal agrarian system were influential in shaping Western perspectives of India.
- Bernier's Opinion on Land Ownership:
According to Bernier, land ownership in Mughal India was very different from European systems. In India, the concept of private land ownership was not as firmly established as in Europe. Instead, land was considered to belong to the state, and peasants were given rights to cultivate land in exchange for taxes. The Mughal emperor owned all the land, and the zamindars (landlords) were merely revenue collectors for the state.
- Influence on Western Economists:
Bernier's description of land ownership in Mughal India had a significant impact on Western economists, particularly those studying agrarian economies. His view of state-controlled land led some Western thinkers, such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo, to contrast it with European systems of private land ownership. They used Bernier's description to argue that the lack of private land ownership in India might have contributed to inefficiencies in the agricultural sector and economic stagnation.
In conclusion, Bernier's observations on land ownership contributed to the development of Western economic theories and provided a foundation for future studies on agrarian systems in colonial and post-colonial contexts.
On the given political outline map of India, locate and label the following with appropriate symbols:
On the same outline map of India, two places have been marked as ‘A’ and ‘B’, as the centres of the Indian National Movement. Identify them and write their correct names on the lines drawn near them.
Read the given source carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Two rebels of 1857
Shah Mal
Shah Mal lived in a large village in pargana Barout in Uttar Pradesh. He belonged to a clan of Jat cultivators whose kinship ties extended over chaurasee des (eighty-four villages). The lands in the region were irrigated and fertile, with rich dark loam soil. Many of the villagers were prosperous and saw the British land revenue system as oppressive: the revenue demand was high and its collection inflexible. Consequently cultivators were losing land to outsiders, to traders and moneylenders who were coming into the area.
Shah Mal mobilised the headmen and cultivators of chaurasee des, moving at night from village to village, urging people to rebel against the British. As in many other places, the revolt against the British turned into a general rebellion against all signs of oppression and injustice. Cultivators left their fields and plundered the houses of moneylenders and traders. Displaced proprietors took possession of the lands they had lost. Shah Mal’s men attacked government buildings, destroyed the bridge over the river, and dug up metalled roads – partly to prevent government forces from coming into the area, and partly because bridges and roads were seen as symbols of British rule. They sent supplies to the sepoys who had mutinied in Delhi and stopped all official communication between British headquarters and Meerut. Locally acknowledged as the Raja, Shah Mal took over the bungalow of an English officer, turned it into a “hall of justice”, settling disputes and dispensing judgments. He also set up an amazingly effective network of intelligence. For a period the people of the area felt that firangi raj was over, and their raj had come.
Shah Mal was killed in battle in July 1857.
How did the rebellion led by Shah Mal challenge the authority of the British?
Read the given source carefully and answer the questions that follow:
Harappan Settlements
So far, more than 2000 Harappan archaeological sites have been discovered in the Indian sub-continent. Most of the sites are found located between the Indus and the Saraswati River basins. Nearly two-thirds of these settlements are in the Saraswati basin, suggesting its immense importance for the Harappan Civilisation. Among these, five major cities have been identified. These are Rakhigarhi, Mohenjodaro, Harappa, Dholavira and Ganweriwala. The remaining sites come under different categories such as Regional Centres, agricultural villages, ports and manufacturing centres.
Examine the importance of classifying Harappan sites.