elephants establish extended and enduring familial relationships as do humans.
To determine which claim the passage does not make, we need to analyze the content presented. First, let's look at each statement from the options:
Now, let's examine how each statement is supported or not supported by the passage:
Option 1: The passage elaborates on how young elephants are born to and raised by younger and inexperienced mothers due to social disruptions. This implies challenges rather than new adaptive strategies by elephant mothers (not explicitly mentioned).
Option 2: This is explicitly mentioned in the passage, highlighting the similarity in responses to trauma between elephants and humans.
Option 3: The passage directly attributes chronic stress and collapses of elephant culture to human actions like poaching and culling.
Option 4: The passage describes the profound social structure of elephants, akin to extended familial relationships in humans.
Therefore, the claim not made by the passage is:
Elephant mothers are evolving newer ways of rearing their calves to adapt to emerging threats.
To determine the statement that best expresses the overall argument of the passage, we should first understand the core message conveyed by the author. The passage discusses the changing relationship between elephants and humans, highlighting the shift from peaceful coexistence to hostility and violence. It particularly emphasizes the impact of poaching, culling, and habitat loss on elephants, leading to societal and cultural disruptions within elephant herds. This has resulted in elephants exhibiting behaviors akin to trauma-related disorders. The author draws parallels between elephants and humans, focusing on their social nature and similar brain development and organization. This evidence supports the argument that recent elephant behavior can be understood as a trauma-related response. The passage centers around the notion of species-wide trauma due to external human-induced factors negatively impacting elephant societies and individual development. Based on this understanding, the statement "Recent elephant behaviour could be understood as a form of species-wide trauma-related response" encapsulates the main argument of the passage. It aligns with the observations and conclusions presented by Bradshaw and her colleagues regarding the effects of environmental and social disruptions on elephant populations, paralleling trauma responses observed in humans.
The correct answer is (B):
To answer this question, we must first carefully read the question. The question wants us to address the problem of aggression in elephants, suggesting that we must pick the option that brings a solution to the problem of elephant aggression.
Option 1 goes out because the testosterone issue is not at all a concern or the bone of contention. Moreover, by understanding it, how would we be able to address the problem concerning elephant aggression.
Option 2 could indeed help us address the problem of elephant aggression because the trauma experienced by elephants is very similar to stress disorder in humans, and because elephants are social creatures just as humans are, insights gained from treating post-traumatic stress disorder in humans might help us address the problem of elephant aggression. Option 2 is the right choice Both option 3 and 4 are not likely to contribute in any ways to addressing the problem of elephant aggression. If yes, then there must a strong evidence for that in the passage, but we have no such evidence.
an accurate description of the condition of elephant herds today.
an exaggeration aimed at bolstering Bradshaw’s claims.
elephant herds and their habitat have been systematically destroyed by humans.
there is a purposefulness in human and elephant aggression towards each other.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?