Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a "could be true" or "acceptable arrangement" question. We must check each option against the rules until we find one that is valid.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
[(A)] (Fiona, Ravi), (Jill, Toby), (Gloria, Shigeru), (Heidi, Vernon).
Violates Rule 3 (Jill cannot skate with Toby).
[(B)] (Gloria, Shigeru), (Heidi, Ravi), (Fiona, Toby), (Jill, Vernon).
Violates Rule 2 (Fiona must be in set 1 or 4, but she is in set 3).
[(C)] (Heidi, Shigeru), (Gloria, Ravi), (Jill, Vernon), (Fiona, Toby).
F in 4 ✓, R before V ✓, J with V ✓, but Rule 4 is violated
(Shigeru must be with Fiona or Gloria, not Heidi).
[(D)] (Heidi, Toby), (Gloria, Shigeru), (Jill, Ravi), (Fiona, Vernon).
- Rule 1: Ravi(3) before Vernon(4).
- Rule 2: Fiona in set 4.
- Rule 3: Jill is with Ravi, not Toby.
- Rule 4: Shigeru with Gloria.
All conditions satisfied.
\fbox{%
\parbox{\dimexpr\linewidth-2\fboxsep-2\fboxrule}{
Final Answer: Option (D) is the only valid arrangement.
}}
% Correct Answer
Correct Answer: (D) Set 1: Heidi, Toby | Set 2: Gloria, Shigeru | Set 3: Jill, Ravi | Set 4: Fiona, Vernon
% Solution
Solution:
Step 1: Checking the Rules against Option (D)
The proposed schedule is:
- Set 1: Heidi and Toby
- Set 2: Gloria and Shigeru
- Set 3: Jill and Ravi
- Set 4: Fiona and Vernon
Let's check each rule:
1. Ravi skates in an earlier set than Vernon does (R \textless V): Ravi is in set 3, Vernon is in set 4. \(3 \textless 4\), so this rule is satisfied.
2. Fiona skates in either set 1 or set 4: Fiona is in set 4. This rule is satisfied.
3. Jill does not skate with Toby: Jill skates with Ravi in set 3. This rule is satisfied.
4. Shigeru skates with either Fiona or Gloria: Shigeru skates with Gloria in set 2. This rule is satisfied.
Step 2: Conclusion
Since the arrangement in option (D) satisfies all four constraints, it is a possible schedule. Other options can be eliminated as they violate one or more rules (e.g., (A) violates Rule 3, (B) violates Rule 2, (C) violates Rule 4).