B.R. Ambedkar’s statement during the Constituent Assembly debates reflects his belief in a strong central government, one that could effectively maintain unity and control over a diverse nation like India. The Government of India Act of 1935 had established a federal system with a relatively weak central authority, and Ambedkar felt that this structure was inadequate for India’s needs post-independence.
1. Strengthening the Centre: Ambedkar believed that a stronger central government would ensure the unity and stability of the newly independent nation. He argued that in a country as diverse as India, the federal system under the 1935 Act had proven ineffective, as regional powers could undermine national policies.
2. Centralized Power for National Unity: Ambedkar’s advocacy for a strong central authority was based on the need for uniformity in policies, particularly in areas like law, governance, and social reform. He saw decentralization as a potential source of conflict, especially between different linguistic, religious, and cultural groups.
Thus, Ambedkar’s argument reflected his pragmatic view that India required a strong central government to address its complex and diverse realities.