Comprehension
Do sports mega events like the summer Olympic Games benefit the host city economically? It depends, but the prospects are less than rosy. The trick is converting...several billion dollars in operating costs during the 17-day fiesta of the Games into a basis for long-term economic returns. These days, the summer Olympic Games themselves generate total revenue of $4 billion to $5 billion, but the lion's share of this goes to the International Olympics Committee, the National Olympics Committees and the International Sports Federations. Any economic benefit would have to flow from the value of the Games as an advertisement for the city, the new transportation and communications infrastructure that was created for the Games, or the ongoing use of the new facilities.
Evidence suggests that the advertising effect is far from certain. The infrastructure benefit depends on the initial condition of the city and the effectiveness of the planning. The facilities benefit is dubious at best for buildings such as velodromes or natatoriums and problematic for 100,000-seat Olympic stadiums. The latter require a conversion plan for future use, the former are usually doomed to near vacancy. Hosting the summer Games generally requires 30-plus sports venues and dozens of training centers. Today, the Bird's Nest in Beijing sits virtually empty, while the Olympic Stadium in Sydney costs some $30 million a year to operate. 
Part of the problem is that Olympics planning takes place in a frenzied and time-pressured atmosphere of intense competition with the other prospective host cities — not optimal conditions for contemplating the future shape of an urban landscape. Another part of the problem is that urban land is generally scarce and growing scarcer. The new facilities often stand for decades or longer. Even if they have future use, are they the best use of precious urban real estate? 
Further, cities must consider the human cost. Residential areas often are razed and citizens relocated (without adequate preparation or compensation). Life is made more hectic and congested. There are, after all, other productive uses that can be made of vanishing fiscal resources.
Question: 1

The central point in the first paragraph is that the economic benefits of the Olympic Games

Updated On: Jul 30, 2025
  • are shared equally among the three organising committees
  • accrue mostly through revenue from advertisements and ticket sales
  • accrue to host cities, if at all, only in the long term
  • are usually eroded by expenditure incurred by the host city
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

To determine the central point of the first paragraph regarding the economic benefits of the Olympic Games, let's dissect the provided comprehension:
The paragraph discusses the economic implications of hosting the Olympics. It mentions that converting the substantial operating costs into long-term economic returns is a challenge, and the revenue generated primarily benefits the International Olympics Committee and other organizations, not the host city. Furthermore, it elaborates on the uncertainties and dubious nature of potential economic benefits such as advertising, infrastructure, and facility uses.
Given these points, the paragraph suggests that any economic benefits accruing to host cities are uncertain and, if realized, would only occur in the long term. Therefore, the correct answer is:
accrue to host cities, if at all, only in the long term
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Sports facilities built for the Olympics are not fully utilised after the Games are over because

Updated On: Jul 30, 2025
  • their scale and the costs of operating them are large
  • their location away from the city centre usually limits easy access.
  • the authorities do not adapt them to local conditions.
  • they become outdated having being built with little planning and under time pressure
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The issue of underutilization of sports facilities built for the Olympics can be primarily attributed to their scale and the substantial costs associated with operating them. These factors significantly limit their use after the games.
The comprehension describes that while the summer Olympic Games can generate a significant amount of revenue, most of it does not benefit the host city directly. The major challenge lies in converting the massive investments and facilities into long-term economic assets. The text provides evidence that facilities like large stadiums often remain nearly vacant or extremely costly to maintain, as seen with examples like the Bird's Nest in Beijing and the Olympic Stadium in Sydney. These facilities require plans for future conversion, otherwise, they remain underutilized.
Moreover, the venues are built in a hurried manner, influenced by intense competition among cities to host the Olympics, which contributes to a lack of optimal future planning. The scarce urban land could be better utilized if not dedicated to these massive structures, which adds to the underutilization problem.
Considering these aspects, the correct answer to the question is: their scale and the costs of operating them are large.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The author feels that the Games place a burden on the host city for all of the following reasons EXCEPT that

Updated On: Jul 30, 2025
  • they divert scarce urban land from more productive uses
  • they involve the demolition of residential structures to accommodate sports facilities and infrastructure
  • the finances used to fund the Games could be better used for other purposes.
  • the influx of visitors during the Games places a huge strain on the urban infrastructure.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The comprehension passage discusses the potential economic impacts of hosting mega sports events like the summer Olympic Games on a host city. It mentions several burdens these Games can place on a city:

  • Diverting scarce urban land from more productive uses, as new facilities may occupy valuable space that could have been used more effectively.
  • Involving the demolition of residential structures, which often leads to relocation of citizens and increases congestion and hectic life conditions.
  • The finances used to fund the Games could be better utilized for other purposes, as the allocation of resources might not yield the expected economic benefits.

However, the author does not state that the influx of visitors places a huge strain on urban infrastructure during the Games. This is the exception among the reasons provided in the options. While the passage does talk about the congestion caused by relocating citizens and the frenzied atmosphere during planning and construction, it doesn’t specifically highlight the strain from visitors.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions