To solve the question involving the rearrangement of jumbled sentence parts, we need to determine the sequence that creates a coherent and meaningful statement related to the effects of harsh laws. Let's examine the provided parts one by one:
We need to determine the sequence that logically connects these sentence fragments:
The correct sequence is PSQR. This order logically connects the ideas and provides a complete understanding of the consequences of harsh laws.
| Option | Sequence | Coherent? |
|---|---|---|
| PSQR | PSQR | Yes, fully coherent |
| QRPS | QRPS | No, lacks coherence |
| SQPR | SQPR | No, lacks coherence |
| QRSP | QRSP | No, lacks coherence |
| RQPS | RQPS | No, lacks coherence |
Thus, the correct answer is indeed PSQR, which forms a coherent sentence discussing the implications of harsh, draconian laws.
If the price of a commodity increases by 25%, by what percentage should the consumption be reduced to keep the expenditure the same?
A shopkeeper marks his goods 40% above cost price and offers a 10% discount. What is his percentage profit?