The passage discusses the behavior and impact of foreign peacekeepers in poor countries. These peacekeepers live separated from the local populace, often in more luxurious conditions, which creates a barrier between them and the communities they are supposed to help. Although their isolation might be justified by the challenges of their job, it results in resentment from locals. The passage suggests an alternative approach of bottom-up peacebuilding, where peacekeepers engage directly with local communities to understand their issues and build trust.
Looking at the provided options:
The first option describes the current situation but does not address the suggested solution for a closer working relationship with locals.
The second option focuses on the resentment due to the peacekeepers' lifestyle but does not highlight the potential benefits of working closely with communities.
The third option correctly summarizes the passage, noting that while the aloofness of peacekeepers may be justified, more effective outcomes would be achieved through direct engagement with local communities.
The fourth option suggests replacing foreign peacekeepers with local residents, which deviates from the passage's proposal of peacekeepers working closely with locals, not replacing them.
Therefore, the best summary of the passage is the third option: Peacekeeping forces in foreign countries have tended to be aloof for valid reasons but would be more effective if they worked more closely with local communities.
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
In investigating memory-beliefs, there are certain points which must be borne in mind. In the first place, everything constituting a memory-belief is happening now, not in that past time to which the belief is said to refer. It is not logically necessary to the existence of a memory-belief that the event remembered should have occurred, or even that the past should have existed at all. There is no logical impossibility in the hypothesis that the world sprang into being five minutes ago, exactly as it then was, with a population that "remembered" a wholly unreal past. There is no logically necessary connection between events at different times; therefore nothing that is happening now or will happen in the future can disprove the hypothesis that the world began five minutes ago. Hence the occurrences which are CALLED knowledge of the past are logically independent of the past; they are wholly analysable into present contents, which might, theoretically, be just what they are even if no past had existed.
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is: