To solve the given fill-in-the-blank problem, we need to determine the words that best fit the context of the sentence. The sentence is:
"A team without a good and simple ________ system is like trying to ________ a car without a steering wheel."
Let us evaluate each option:
-
guiding … move: The phrase "guiding system" may seem relevant, but "trying to move a car without a steering wheel" is not conceptually correct, as "moving" can be done even if the steering wheel is absent.
-
convincing … push: A "convincing system" doesn't logically fit into a structural requirement needed in a team, and "pushing a car without a steering wheel" doesn't create a coherent comparison.
-
working … drive: A "working system" is conceptually essential for a team, and "trying to drive a car without a steering wheel" accurately reflects the difficulty posed when something crucial is missing. This option makes logical sense with the analogy given.
-
developmental ... pull: A "developmental system" might work, but "pulling a car without a steering wheel" doesn't maintain a coherent idea similar to steering and guiding.
-
leading … propel: While "leading system" may seem relevant, "propelling a car without a steering wheel" doesn't properly convey the imagery of control and direction, which the sentence seems to imply.
From this analysis, it is clear that the correct choice is "working … drive". The sentence with these words reflects a meaningful and logical comparison between the necessity of a good system for a team and a steering wheel for a car, both crucial for effective direction and operation.
Conclusion: The best words that complete the sentence meaningfully are "working" and "drive".