Question:

Direction: Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.
In recent years, complaints of sexual harassment at “Fair Consulting” had increased exponentially. Fair Consulting had a gender-neutral, anti-sexual harassment policy and a committee to adjudicate on complaints. During the hearing of complaints, allegations and counter-allegations would fly thick and fast. This made it difficult for the adjudicating committee to conclusively decide on the complaints.
The CEO of Fair Consulting wanted the adjudicating committee to reduce the number of errors while deciding on sexual harassment complaints. The employees suggested that the committee could do the following to reduce errors in judgement.
1). Listen to the arguments of both the complainant and the accused together
2). Listen to the arguments of both the complainant and the accused separately
3). Involve a member of women’s commission
4). Take the help of a retired judge
5). Hire a forensic expert to verify evidences
From the following, choose the MOST effective sequence that would help the committee to arrive at the right decision.

Updated On: Aug 9, 2024
  • 1, 2, 4
  • 2, 4, 1
  • 2, 3, 4
  • 2, 1 ,5
  • 1, 2, 3
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

2, 1, 5 is the most effective sequence that would help the committee to arrive at the right decision. As a first step, the committee should listen to the complainant and the accused separately so that both of them can explain their respective points of view. Once the committee hears both the parties separately, it’s important to bring them together to know the truth. Once facts are established, they should be verified with the help of empirical evidence, which would be provided by the forensic expert after verifying evidence

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Verbal Reasoning

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions