Question

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the THREE questions that follow.
Interpretation in our own time, however, is even more complex. For the contemporary zeal for the project of interpretation is often prompted not by piety toward the troublesome text (which may conceal an aggression), but by an open aggressiveness, an overt contempt for appearances. The old style of interpretation was insistent, but respectful; it erected another meaning on top of the literal one. The modern style of interpretation excavates, and as it excavates, destroys; it digs “behind” the text, to find a sub-text which is the true one. The most celebrated and influential modern doctrines, those of Marx and Freud, actually amount to elaborate systems of hermeneutics, aggressive and impious theories of interpretation. All observable phenomena are bracketed, in Freud’s phrase, as manifest content. This manifest content must be probed and pushed aside to find the true meaning—the latent content beneath. For Marx, social events like revolutions and wars; for Freud, the events of individual lives (like neurotic symptoms and slips of the tongue) as well as texts (like a dream or a work of art)—all are treated as occasions for interpretation. According to Marx and Freud, these events only seem to be intelligible. Actually, they have no meaning without interpretation. To understand is to interpret. And to interpret is to restate the phenomenon, in effect to find an equivalent for it.
Thus, interpretation is not (as most people assume) an absolute value, a gesture of mind situated in some timeless realm of capabilities. Interpretation must itself be evaluated, within a historical view of human consciousness. In some cultural contexts, interpretation is a liberating act. It is a means of revising, of transvaluing, of escaping the dead past. In other cultural contexts, it is reactionary, impertinent, cowardly and stifling.
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT an act of interpretation?

• A. Investigating class-conflict in Charles Dicken’s novels
• B. Searching for underlying themes in a historical document
• C. Finding underlying causes of a social evil described in a book
• D. Critical appreciation of a literary text
• E. Labelling a text as blasphemous

Answer 1

Answer: (E)

To determine which action does not constitute an act of interpretation based on the text provided, consider the criteria for interpretation as outlined in the passage. The passage distinguishes interpretation as a process that involves analyzing and uncovering deeper or hidden meanings beneath apparent content. It involves understanding phenomena by reinterpreting or finding equivalent meanings, whether under Marxist, Freudian, or general critical perspectives.

Let's evaluate each option:

• Investigating class-conflict in Charles Dicken’s novels: This involves probing deeper themes, which aligns with the modern style of interpretation described in the passage.
• Searching for underlying themes in a historical document: This activity involves looking beyond the surface to uncover hidden meanings, thus an act of interpretation.
• Finding underlying causes of a social evil described in a book: This requires going beyond the literal narrative to understand deeper sociocultural dynamics, qualifying as interpretation.
• Critical appreciation of a literary text: While this can involve analysis, it more often refers to evaluating the aesthetic and thematic elements without necessarily excavating hidden meanings, but it can still be considered interpretation depending on depth.
• Labeling a text as blasphemous: This is a judgment based on surface content, without an investigative interpretation process as described in the passage. It does not involve uncovering deeper meanings.

The option that does not qualify as an act of interpretation, based on the criteria set by the passage, is Labeling a text as blasphemous.