The question seeks to identify the "contradictory pulls" on Indian nationalism as described in the provided comprehension passage. The passage elaborates on the dichotomy between material and spiritual spheres within Indian nationalist ideology during the colonial period. The essential point is that while fighting against colonial rule, Indian nationalism felt compelled to adopt certain Western practices, particularly in the material realm such as science and technology. However, it aimed to retain its own spiritual identity distinct from Western influence. This dynamic illustrates the "contradictory pull"—borrowing from the colonizer materially while maintaining spiritual independence.
Despite its fight against colonial domination, Indian nationalism had to borrow from the coloniser in the material sphere.
This option accurately captures the need to adopt Western methods in the material domain while resisting cultural assimilation, as emphasized in the passage.
The passage describes the Indian nationalist movement's framework for addressing the influence of colonialism. It discusses the material/spiritual and outer/inner dichotomies, where the material/outer world represents British/European superiority in science, technology, and statecraft. Indians acknowledged the need to adopt these material aspects but aimed to preserve their spiritual 'inner' identity. Nationalists believed the East had a superior spiritual culture that colonial powers failed to dominate, and preserving this identity was crucial during the national struggle.
The correct choice to weaken the author's claims, which talk about maintaining a distinction between Western materiality and Eastern spirituality, is the option stating:
"The colonial period saw the hybridisation of Indian culture in all realms as it came in contact with British/European culture."
If true, this statement suggests that the distinction between Eastern and Western cultures wasn't maintained; instead, there was hybridization, contradicting the notion of a clear separation and a preserved spiritual identity during colonial times.
To determine which statement about the spiritual/material dichotomy of Indian nationalism is NOT true based on the passage, we need to analyze the details provided in the passage. The passage describes how Indian nationalism included a division of culture into material and spiritual spheres. This separation was used to resist colonial dominance while adopting certain Western techniques without losing cultural identity.
This is true, as the passage explains that the material/spiritual distinction condensed into the ghar (home) and bāhir (world) dichotomy, with spiritual aspects aligning with home and material with the world.
This is the correct answer. The passage does not discuss the spiritual/material dichotomy as a continuation of traditional cultural oppositions. Instead, it introduces this dichotomy as an extension of nationalist thought to counter colonial influence, particularly emphasizing a 'new substance' to these existing categories.
This statement is supported by the passage, as it describes the dichotomy as essential for protecting and strengthening the inner spiritual identity against colonial material dominance.
The passage claims the inner/outer dichotomy (home/world) was ideologically more powerful, showing this statement is true.
The correct option is the statement about the spiritual/material dichotomy representing a continuation of age-old oppositions in Indian culture. The passage emphasizes the dichotomy's new ideological substance introduced during nationalist movements, making this the incorrect statement.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?