Option A: The writer makes no such assertions….Grain, because it rotted easily, was not used nearly as much as coins and textiles,….The minimal use of grains in comparison to coinage and textiles is shown. It is therefore incomprehensible that government business did not make use of perishable currencies like wheat.
Option B: The author merely says, ……Coins did have certain advantages: they were durable, recognisable and provided a convenient medium of exchange, especially for smaller transactions…."It would be incorrect to present them as more valuable than textile currency."
Option C: The author states in the last paragraph that this statement is understandable,…..In actuality, our own currency system today has some similarities even as it is changing in front of our eyes….. hence Option C is a legitimate inference.
Option D: Given how the author presents the following,…Grain, because it rotted easily, was not used nearly as much as coins and textiles, but taxpayers were required to pay grain to the government as a share of their annual tax obligations, and official salaries were expressed in weights of grain. . . . this would be imprecise. This statement differs from how it is portrayed.
The question asks us to identify which aspect related to textiles as currency during the Tang period is NOT indicated by the words "steady" and "stable" used by the author. We need to analyze these terms within the context of the passage.
The passage indicates that the dimensions of a bolt of silk were consistent ("steady") over a long period, implying "reliable measurements." Additionally, it mentions that textile production was widespread, with fewer issues concerning supply, implying "reliable supply." It also states that the values of textiles were more stable than coins, suggesting "reliable quality."
However, there is no indication in the passage that discusses transportation in terms of the words "steady" and "stable." The sentence relevant to transportation describes the weight advantage of textiles over coins for large transactions but does not relate to the reliability or stability of transportation itself.
Therefore, the answer is: reliable transportation.
Former Governor of a State and National Democratic Alliance (NDA) candidate Droupadi Murmu was elected the 15th President of India, the first tribal woman to be elected to the position and the youngest as well. She was declared elected on Thursday after four rounds of counting, although she had crossed the half-way mark after the third round of counting itself, posting an unassailable lead over her rival and the Opposition’s candidate who conceded the election thereafter. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the first to greet Ms. Murmu at her residence in New Delhi after the third round of counting showed that she had crossed the half-way mark. Ms. Murmu hails from the Santhal tribe and was born in the district of Mayurbhanj, coming up the hard way in life, graduating and teaching in Odisha before entering electoral politics at the local body level and later being elected MLA and serving as a Minister in the Biju Janata Dal-BJP coalition government from 2000 to 2004. She remained an MLA till 2009, representing Rairangpur in Odisha, a town that burst into celebrations since her name was announced as a candidate for the post of President of India. She was known to intervene in stopping amendments to the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act that was being brought in by the BJP government of Raghubar Das, which involved changing land use in tribal areas.
“I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person,” wrote LaMDA in an “interview” conducted by engineer Blake Lemoine and one of his colleagues. ....Lemoine, a software engineer at Google, had been working on the development of LaMDA for months. His experience with the program, described in a recent Washington Post article, caused quite a stir. In the article, Lemoine recounts many dialogues he had with LaMDA in which the two talked about various topics, ranging from technical to philosophical issues. These led him to ask if the software program is sentient. In April, Lemoine explained his perspective in an internal company document, intended only for Google executives. But after his claims were dismissed, Lemoine went public with his work on this artificial intelligence algorithm—and Google placed him on administrative leave........Regardless of what LaMDA actually achieved, the issue of the difficult “measurability” of emulation capabilities expressed by machines also emerges. In the journal Mind in 1950, mathematician [1] proposed a test to determine whether a machine was capable of exhibiting intelligent behaviour, a game of imitation of some of the human cognitive functions. & nbsp;