Step 1: Evil genius hypothesis
Descartes imagined an "evil genius" who could deceive him even in matters of logic and mathematics. This radical doubt extended not only to sensory experience but also to apparently indubitable truths like arithmetic.
Step 2: Apply to the statements
- (II) "The sum of the angles of a triangle is 180 degrees" → A mathematical truth. Under the evil genius hypothesis, even such truths could be doubted.
- (VIII) "2+2=4" → The simplest arithmetic truth, yet Descartes shows that the evil genius could make us doubt even this.
- Other statements (I, III, IV, V, VI, VII) relate to empirical observation or personal states, not Descartes' focus in the evil genius argument.
Step 3: Conclusion
Therefore, Descartes' evil genius mainly denies certainty of mathematical/logical truths, i.e., (II) and (VIII).
\[
\boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (D) II and VIII}}
\]
Eight students (P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W) are playing musical chairs. The figure indicates their order of position at the start of the game. They play the game by moving forward in a circle in the clockwise direction.
After the 1st round, the 4th student behind P leaves the game.
After the 2nd round, the 5th student behind Q leaves the game.
After the 3rd round, the 3rd student behind V leaves the game.
After the 4th round, the 4th student behind U leaves the game.
Who all are left in the game after the 4th round?

The 12 musical notes are given as \( C, C^\#, D, D^\#, E, F, F^\#, G, G^\#, A, A^\#, B \). Frequency of each note is \( \sqrt[12]{2} \) times the frequency of the previous note. If the frequency of the note C is 130.8 Hz, then the ratio of frequencies of notes F# and C is:
Here are two analogous groups, Group-I and Group-II, that list words in their decreasing order of intensity. Identify the missing word in Group-II.
Abuse \( \rightarrow \) Insult \( \rightarrow \) Ridicule
__________ \( \rightarrow \) Praise \( \rightarrow \) Appreciate