We need to evaluate the truthfulness of each statement regarding linear transformations and their properties related to range space and null space.
Statement I: There exists a linear transformation from \(\R^3\) to itself such that its range space and null space are the same.
To understand this, we utilize the Rank-Nullity Theorem, which states:
\(\text{dim}(\text{Null}(T)) + \text{dim}(\text{Range}(T)) = \text{dim}(V) \), where \( V \) is the vector space on which the transformation \( T \) is defined.
For a linear transformation from \(\R^3\) to itself, we have:
\(\text{dim}(\text{Null}(T)) + \text{dim}(\text{Range}(T)) = 3 \)
For the null space and range space to be the same, their dimensions must be equal. Say they both have dimension \( k \), so:
\(k + k = 3 \)
which leads to \(2k = 3 \), and clearly \( k \) cannot be a fraction. Therefore, such a transformation cannot exist in \(\R^3\) .
Conclusion for I: FALSE.
Statement II: There exists a linear transformation from \(\R^2\) to itself such that its range space and null space are the same.
Applying the Rank-Nullity Theorem for \(\R^2\) :
\(\text{dim}(\text{Null}(T)) + \text{dim}(\text{Range}(T)) = 2 \)
If the dimensions are the same, say they are both \( k \), then:
\(k + k = 2 \)
giving \(k = 1 \). This is possible, where both subspaces can have the same dimension of 1. Therefore, such a transformation can indeed exist in \(\R^2\) .
Conclusion for II: TRUE.
Based on this analysis, the correct option is that "II is TRUE but I is FALSE".