The phrase ”an invention to rival gunpowder” is used metaphorically to emphasize the significance of Moutai’s claim to be hangover-proof, likening it to a revolutionary discovery. This is not meant literally but to suggest the potential impact of the product.
Therefore, the correct answer is option (2).
Moutai’s success is partly due to its appeal to the older age group, who have the purchasing power and cultural ties to Moutai. However, as millennials grow older, health concerns and changing preferences could become a threat to this consumer base.
Therefore, option (4) is both a reason for success and a potential risk.
The passage suggests that Moutai specifically targets the super-rich rather than the middle class, where competition is fierce. Marketing to the middle class is not seen as a key strategy for Moutai’s success, and this is why option (2) is the exception.
The author refers to Moutai’s marketing strategy as “the unholy trinity” because it relies on nationalism, elitism, and ageism—factors that diverge from the Western marketing strategies which typically emphasize inclusivity, sustainability, and appeal to a broad demographic.
Therefore, option (3) is the most likely explanation.
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?