Comprehension

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
[S]pices were a global commodity centuries before European voyages. There was a complex chain of relations, yet consumers had little knowledge of producers and vice versa. Desire for spices helped fuel European colonial empires to create political, military and commercial networks under a single power.
Historians know a fair amount about the supply of spices in Europe during the medieval period – the origins, methods of transportation, the prices – but less about demand. Why go to such extraordinary efforts to procure expensive products from exotic lands? Still, demand was great enough to inspire the voyages of Christopher Columbus and Vasco Da Gama, launching the first fateful wave of European colonialism. . . .
So, why were spices so highly prized in Europe in the centuries from about 1000 to 1500? One widely disseminated explanation for medieval demand for spices was that they covered the taste of spoiled meat. . . . Medieval purchasers consumed meat much fresher than what the average city-dweller in the developed world of today has at hand. However, refrigeration was not available, and some hot spices have been shown to serve as an anti-bacterial agent. Salting, smoking or drying meat were other means of preservation. Most spices used in cooking began as medical ingredients, and throughout the Middle Ages spices were used as both medicines and condiments. Above all, medieval recipes involve the combination of medical and culinary lore in order to balance food's humeral properties and prevent disease. Most spices were hot and dry and so appropriate in sauces to counteract the moist and wet properties supposedly possessed by most meat and fish. . . .
Where spices came from was known in a vague sense centuries before the voyages of Columbus. Just how vague may be judged by looking at medieval world maps . . . To the medieval European imagination, the East was exotic and alluring. Medieval maps often placed India close to the so-called Earthly Paradise, the Garden of Eden described in the Bible.
Geographical knowledge has a lot to do with the perceptions of spices’ relative scarcity and the reasons for their high prices. An example of the varying notions of scarcity is the conflicting information about how pepper is harvested. As far back as the 7th century Europeans thought that pepper in India grew on trees "guarded" by serpents that would bite and poison anyone who attempted to gather the fruit. The only way to harvest pepper was to burn the trees, which would drive the snakes underground. Of course, this bit of lore would explain the shriveled black peppercorns, but not white, pink or other colors.
Spices never had the enduring allure or power of gold and silver or the commercial potential of new products such as tobacco, indigo or sugar. But the taste for spices did continue for a while beyond the Middle Ages. As late as the 17th century, the English and the Dutch were struggling for control of the Spice Islands: Dutch New Amsterdam, or New York, was exchanged by the British for one of the Moluccan Islands where nutmeg was grown.

Question: 1

If a trader brought white peppercorns from India to medieval Europe, all of the following are unlikely to happen, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Nov 30, 2024
  • Europeans would doubt the story of pepper harvesting.
  • the price of spices would decrease.
  • pepper would no longer be considered exotic.
  • medieval maps would be used as navigational aids.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

In the passage, it’s mentioned that Europeans believed that pepper grew on trees ”guarded” by serpents, which is an example of the lore and misconceptions surrouning spices. Therefore, they would indeed question such stories. However, the price of spices (Option 2) would not decrease because the spice trade was highly valued, and pepper would continue to be seen as exotic (Option 3). The use of medieval maps for navigation (Option 4) was not mentioned in the context of trade or pepper specifically, so it is unlikely.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

In the context of the passage, the people who heard the story of pepper trees being guarded by snakes would be least likely to arrive at the conclusion that

Updated On: Nov 30, 2024
  • it is not advisable to go to India to harvest the pepper themselves.
  • this is why pepper is so hot.
  • it is no surprise that the pepper supply is so limited.
  • pepper is costly for good reason.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The passage mentions that medieval Europeans believed that pepper in India grew on trees ”guarded” by serpents, a myth that contributed to the perception of pepper’s scarcity. The conclusion that ”this is why pepper is so hot” is not supported by the passage, as the hotness of pepper is unrelated to the myth of the serpents. The other options are more consistent with the lore about pepper’s rarity and the associated cost, making them more likely conclusions.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

It can be inferred that all of the following contributed to a decline in the allure of spices, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Nov 30, 2024
  • increase in the availability of spices.
  • changes in European cuisine.
  • changes in the system of medical treatment.
  • the development of refrigeration techniques.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The passage mentions that the allure of spices declined over time due to several factors, including changes in European cuisine, changes in medical treatment, and the development of refrigeration techniques. However, the passage does not indicate that an increase in the availability of spices contributed to a decline in their allure. In fact, an increase in supply would likely have the opposite effect, making spices less rare and possibly reducing their allure.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

In the context of the passage, which one of the following conclusions CANNOT be reached?

Updated On: Nov 30, 2024
  • Colonialism was motivated by the demand for spices.
  • Tobacco was more marketable than spices.
  • The spice trade was a driver of colonial expansion.
  • India was colonised for its spices and gold.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage emphasizes that the desire for spices helped fuel European colonialism and created political, military, and commercial networks, but there is no mention of gold or India being specifically colonized for its spices and gold together. The passage makes it clear that the spice trade was one of the key motivations for colonialism, but it does not claim that India was colonized explicitly for both spices and gold.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CAT exam

View More Questions