Comprehension
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
[S]pices were a global commodity centuries before European voyages. There was a complex chain of relations, yet consumers had little knowledge of producers and vice versa. Desire for spices helped fuel European colonial empires to create political, military and commercial networks under a single power.
Historians know a fair amount about the supply of spices in Europe during the medieval period – the origins, methods of transportation, the prices – but less about demand. Why go to such extraordinary efforts to procure expensive products from exotic lands? Still, demand was great enough to inspire the voyages of Christopher Columbus and Vasco Da Gama, launching the first fateful wave of European colonialism. . . .
So, why were spices so highly prized in Europe in the centuries from about 1000 to 1500? One widely disseminated explanation for medieval demand for spices was that they covered the taste of spoiled meat. . . . Medieval purchasers consumed meat much fresher than what the average city-dweller in the developed world of today has at hand. However, refrigeration was not available, and some hot spices have been shown to serve as an anti-bacterial agent. Salting, smoking or drying meat were other means of preservation. Most spices used in cooking began as medical ingredients, and throughout the Middle Ages spices were used as both medicines and condiments. Above all, medieval recipes involve the combination of medical and culinary lore in order to balance food's humeral properties and prevent disease. Most spices were hot and dry and so appropriate in sauces to counteract the moist and wet properties supposedly possessed by most meat and fish. . . .
Where spices came from was known in a vague sense centuries before the voyages of Columbus. Just how vague may be judged by looking at medieval world maps . . . To the medieval European imagination, the East was exotic and alluring. Medieval maps often placed India close to the so-called Earthly Paradise, the Garden of Eden described in the Bible.
Geographical knowledge has a lot to do with the perceptions of spices’ relative scarcity and the reasons for their high prices. An example of the varying notions of scarcity is the conflicting information about how pepper is harvested. As far back as the 7th century Europeans thought that pepper in India grew on trees "guarded" by serpents that would bite and poison anyone who attempted to gather the fruit. The only way to harvest pepper was to burn the trees, which would drive the snakes underground. Of course, this bit of lore would explain the shriveled black peppercorns, but not white, pink or other colors.
Spices never had the enduring allure or power of gold and silver or the commercial potential of new products such as tobacco, indigo or sugar. But the taste for spices did continue for a while beyond the Middle Ages. As late as the 17th century, the English and the Dutch were struggling for control of the Spice Islands: Dutch New Amsterdam, or New York, was exchanged by the British for one of the Moluccan Islands where nutmeg was grown.
Question: 1

If a trader brought white peppercorns from India to medieval Europe, all of the following are unlikely to happen, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Jul 20, 2025
  • Europeans would doubt the story of pepper harvesting.
  • the price of spices would decrease.
  • pepper would no longer be considered exotic.
  • medieval maps would be used as navigational aids.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

To solve this question, we must identify which option is consistent with the historical context provided in the passage.

1. Understanding the options:

  • Europeans would doubt the story of pepper harvesting: The passage mentions that from as early as the 7th century, Europeans had misconceptions about pepper harvesting due to stories involving serpents in India. Doubting such stories aligns with historical accounts.
  • The price of spices would decrease: The import of more spices like white peppercorns into Europe from India could potentially disrupt the market, but the high demand and limited supply historically maintained prices.
  • Pepper would no longer be considered exotic: The passage emphasizes spice's exotic nature and allure due to their origins and the medieval European's limited geographical understanding.
  • Medieval maps would be used as navigational aids: The passage explains that medieval maps lacked precise geographical knowledge, making them unreliable for navigation.

2. Correct Answer: Europeans would doubt the story of pepper harvesting. This is consistent with historical misunderstandings about spice origins and methods of harvesting.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

In the context of the passage, the people who heard the story of pepper trees being guarded by snakes would be least likely to arrive at the conclusion that

Updated On: Jul 20, 2025
  • it is not advisable to go to India to harvest the pepper themselves.
  • this is why pepper is so hot.
  • it is no surprise that the pepper supply is so limited.
  • pepper is costly for good reason.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The given passage primarily discusses the historical significance and allure of spices, particularly pepper, during medieval times. It mentions misconceptions about spices and the geographical ignorance prevalent among Europeans. One such misconception was the belief that pepper trees in India were guarded by snakes, leading to peculiar harvesting stories.
The question asks which conclusion would be least likely drawn by people who believed the story about snakes guarding pepper trees.
  • Option 1: "It is not advisable to go to India to harvest the pepper themselves." - The intimidating idea of encountering snakes could deter people from traveling to India for pepper, making this a likely conclusion.
  • Option 2: "This is why pepper is so hot." - The snake-guarding story does not provide a basis for connecting pepper's heat to the guarding snakes. There is no logical association between the presence of snakes and the pungency of pepper.
  • Option 3: "It is no surprise that the pepper supply is so limited." - The danger associated with harvesting might logically lead to the belief that pepper supply is limited, supporting this conclusion.
  • Option 4: "Pepper is costly for good reason." - The perceived risk and difficulty involved in harvesting due to snakes could lead to the assumption that the high price is justified.
The least likely conclusion based on the passage would be Option 2, "This is why pepper is so hot."
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

It can be inferred that all of the following contributed to a decline in the allure of spices, EXCEPT:

Updated On: Jul 20, 2025
  • increase in the availability of spices.
  • changes in European cuisine.
  • changes in the system of medical treatment.
  • the development of refrigeration techniques.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

To determine which option did NOT contribute to the decline in the allure of spices, we need to analyze each provided option in light of the passage:
  • Increase in the availability of spices: The passage implies that despite the efforts to source spices, they were not as abundantly available, thus maintaining their allure. The increase in availability would not diminish their allure; rather, it might increase interest due to greater accessibility.
  • Changes in European cuisine: The passage discusses how spices played a role in culinary traditions, suggesting that shifts in cooking styles could reduce reliance on spices.
  • Changes in the system of medical treatment: Spices were initially used as medicinal ingredients. Advancements in medical practices could reduce the need for spices as medicine.
  • The development of refrigeration techniques: The absence of refrigeration made spices important for preservation. Introduction of refrigeration could lower the need for hot spices as an anti-bacterial agent.
The passage emphasizes how spices maintained their attraction until the 17th century due to their exotic and scarce nature. Thus, the increase in availability did not contribute to their decline in allure. Therefore, the correct answer is:
Increase in the availability of spices.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

In the context of the passage, which one of the following conclusions CANNOT be reached?

Updated On: Jul 20, 2025
  • Colonialism was motivated by the demand for spices.
  • Tobacco was more marketable than spices.
  • The spice trade was a driver of colonial expansion.
  • India was colonised for its spices and gold.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The question asks us to determine which conclusion CANNOT be reached based on the passage. Let's analyze each option:
1. Colonialism was motivated by the demand for spices.
2. Tobacco was more marketable than spices.
3. The spice trade was a driver of colonial expansion.
4. India was colonised for its spices and gold.
Examining the passage, it explains that the demand for spices was significant enough to inspire voyages like those of Columbus and Da Gama, indicating colonial endeavors were indeed motivated by spice demand. It also states spices never had the enduring allure of gold or the commercial potential of new products like tobacco, suggesting tobacco was more marketable than spices. Furthermore, the passage notes the spice trade helped fuel colonial empires, suggesting it was a driver of colonial expansion. However, the passage does not mention India being colonised specifically for gold alongside spices. Thus, the conclusion that cannot be reached from the passage is:
India was colonised for its spices and gold.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions