The passage explains that carnivores who become reliant on human-provided food lose their instinctive fear of humans. This loss of fear increases their chances of conflict with humans, ultimately leading to their habituation to human presence.
According to Penteriani’s research and Wilkinson’s statement, human-carnivore conflicts are more likely in areas where diverse landscapes, including farmland and carnivore habitats, overlap. This landscape heterogeneity increases the probability of encounters between humans and carnivores, as they share the same geographic space.
The passage mentions that predatory attacks by carnivores are rare, accounting for only 17% of attacks in North America since 1955. This makes option (2) inconsistent with the passage’s description.
The scenario most likely to exacerbate the frequency of carnivore-human conflicts is “Unleashing dogs by pet owners in areas with known high concentrations of large carnivores”. This is because unleashed dogs can provoke encounters with large carnivores, potentially leading to conflicts.
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?