The term ”homo economicus” refers to an economic model of rational behavior. It describes an individual who always makes decisions by considering the utility of their actions and maximizing their personal benefit, often making decisions based solely on their preferences.
The author uses the phrase ”times have changed” sarcastically, referring to how economists, once closed off from other disciplines, are now becoming more open by incorporating ideas from fields such as psychology and history. The tone suggests a shift in the discipline, with economists now more willing to collaborate and learn from other perspectives.
The author points out that Becker applied economic methods to non-market phenomena, such as crime and domesticity, but did not borrow from other disciplines like anthropology or history. This indicates that Becker’s work was one-sided and did not integrate interdisciplinary perspectives.
The author critiques Schiller for ignoring the role of institutions in mediating the link between perceptions and behavior. Schiller’s approach oversimplifies the dynamic by focusing on emotions and economic behavior, without considering the vital role institutions like political parties, lobby groups, and media organizations play in shaping societal outcomes.
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?