If societies outside of Europe perceive the Earth as an inanimate provider of resources, it contradicts the personification implied by the use of "who" for Gaia. Within the passage, the author employs the term "curse" in the title and utilizes the pronoun "who" for Gaia, indicating a viewpoint that regards the Earth as a living, sentient entity. If non-European societies do not share this viewpoint and instead regard the Earth as a non-living resource, it raises questions about the appropriateness of using the pronoun "who" for Gaia in the context of their beliefs. This discrepancy would render the reviewer's selection of the pronoun "who" inappropriate, given the divergent perspectives on the Earth's nature.
So, the correct option is (A): Non-European societies have perceived the Earth as a non-living source of all resources.
Option A cannot be directly inferred from the passage. The passage delves into the historical context of climate change as depicted in "The Nutmeg's Curse" and underscores the influence of colonialism on the prevailing perception of nature and the environment. It proposes that alternative perspectives from non-European and/or pre-colonial societies could offer valuable insights for policymakers in environmental preservation. However, the passage does not explicitly assert that academic discourses have consistently served the purpose of raising awareness about environmental preservation.
The passage aligns with Option D by linking the history of climate change with colonialism, emphasizes in Option B that colonial processes have shaped contemporary views of nature and the environment, and suggests in Option C that non-European and/or pre-colonial societies possess valuable insights for environmental preservation policymakers.
The correct option is (A): academic discourses have always served the function of raising awareness about environmental preservation.
Observers of global climate negotiations are familiar with the Latin American perspective of Earth as Pachamama (Earth Mother). However, they also understand that this framing is often merely superficial and disregarded in the substantive aspects of the negotiations. In his work "The Nutmeg's Curse," Ghosh elucidates the reasons behind this phenomenon. He illustrates the deep-seated vested interests in the oil economy, not only among oil-exporting nations but also in superpowers like the US, which exert control over oil drilling, pricing, and transportation worldwide. It is widely recognized that power utilities are presently impeding the progress of decentralized solar power generation due to its adverse effects on their revenues and control. The passage makes it evident that the failure of climate change policies cannot be attributed to the decentralized nature of renewable energy sources such as solar power. Instead, it suggests that power utilities may be sabotaging decentralized solar power generation to protect their financial interests and control. Thus, Option C, which posits decentralization as a cause for policy failure, is not supported by the passage.
So, the correct option is (C): The decentralised characteristic of renewable energy resources like solar power.
"These are the two points to which Ghosh returns through examples from around the world. One, how European colonialists decimated not only indigenous populations but also indigenous understanding of the relationship between humans and Earth. Two, how this was an invasion not only of humans but of the Earth itself, and how this continues to the present day by looking at nature as a 'resource' to exploit…."
The passage explores how the colonization of the Banda islands, as depicted in "The Nutmeg's Curse," serves as an illustration of the broader concept that colonialism played a significant role in shaping the attitudes and behaviors that have contributed to climate change. It depicts the exploitation of both indigenous populations and the Earth's resources during colonial times as a crucial factor in perpetuating the perspective that views nature merely as a resource to be exploited, thereby exacerbating the environmental challenges faced today. Thus, the primary objective of discussing the colonization of the Banda islands is to underscore how colonialism represented and perpetuated the mindset that has ultimately led to climate change.
The correct option is (B):To illustrate how colonialism represented and perpetuated the mindset that has led to climate change..
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?