In the passage, the author observes that Pinker acknowledges rationality as being both "a cognitive and moral virtue." Nevertheless, the author highlights that Pinker's book does not extensively delve into this "profoundly important" association between rationality and morality. By referencing the ancient Greek philosophers who, as per the text, subtly investigated the correlation between moral character and rationality, the author suggests that Pinker's work could gain from a deeper examination of the ethical aspect of rational conduct. Option (C) aptly conveys this notion, as none of the other options accurately encapsulate the intention behind mentioning the Greek philosophers.
So, the correct option is (C): reveal gaps in Pinker's discussion of the importance of ethical considerations in rational behaviour.
In the case of Kekule, the revelation of the benzene structure reportedly occurred to him in a dream, demonstrating how creative insights can emerge unexpectedly and unconsciously. Similarly, Mozart's symphonies, revered as masterpieces of classical music, are often regarded as manifestations of his musical genius and creative intuition. These examples bolster the notion that groundbreaking achievements in both scientific and artistic realms may involve moments of inspiration, intuition, or epiphany, challenging the notion that all significant accomplishments stem solely from conscious and sequential reasoning. This underscores the broader point that while conscious reasoning is valuable, subconscious and intuitive processes also play a role in generating innovative ideas and creations.
So, the correct option is (D): great innovations across various fields can stem from flashes of intuition and are not always propelled by logical thinking.
The passage underscores Pinker's emphasis on sequential reasoning and the tools of rationality, suggesting that mastering these tools can enhance decision-making in various practical scenarios where individuals must navigate "uncertain and shifting information." The author's endorsement or support for Pinker's work revolves around the concept that logical reasoning "equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems" [Option B].
Option A is inaccurate - although the author acknowledges Pinker's perspective on rationality as a moral virtue, they note that Pinker's exploration of the role of moral and ethical education is lacking.
Option C focuses on a specific application of Pinker's views and fails to capture the broader message.
Option D similarly confines the discussion to the broader utility of rationality in decision-making.
So, the correct option is (B): equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems.
According to the discussion, the option not aligned with Pinker's perspective on rational thinking (and that of the ancient Greek philosophers) is Option C. The passage implies that while sequential reasoning holds value, many significant human breakthroughs stem from moments of epiphany or insight rather than solely from conscious, sequential reasoning.
In line with this notion, it is suggested that an emphasis on rational thought includes acknowledging the gaps in one's own knowledge [Option D] and "arriving at independent conclusions" [Option A]. As evidenced by the passage's reference to Plato's Socrates, who prefigured many of Pinker's arguments by almost 2,500 years, rational thinking involves recognizing one's limitations and thoroughly examining all premises in arguments rather than merely relying on speakers' authority or charisma.
Towards the passage's conclusion, it is mentioned that there exists an ethical and moral aspect [Option B] to rationality, which Pinker acknowledges but does not delve into extensively.
Therefore, Option C is the correct choice, as it does not align with Pinker's view on rational thinking as discussed in the passage.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |