In the passage, the author observes that Pinker acknowledges rationality as being both "a cognitive and moral virtue." Nevertheless, the author highlights that Pinker's book does not extensively delve into this "profoundly important" association between rationality and morality. By referencing the ancient Greek philosophers who, as per the text, subtly investigated the correlation between moral character and rationality, the author suggests that Pinker's work could gain from a deeper examination of the ethical aspect of rational conduct. Option (C) aptly conveys this notion, as none of the other options accurately encapsulate the intention behind mentioning the Greek philosophers.
So, the correct option is (C): reveal gaps in Pinker's discussion of the importance of ethical considerations in rational behaviour.
In the case of Kekule, the revelation of the benzene structure reportedly occurred to him in a dream, demonstrating how creative insights can emerge unexpectedly and unconsciously. Similarly, Mozart's symphonies, revered as masterpieces of classical music, are often regarded as manifestations of his musical genius and creative intuition. These examples bolster the notion that groundbreaking achievements in both scientific and artistic realms may involve moments of inspiration, intuition, or epiphany, challenging the notion that all significant accomplishments stem solely from conscious and sequential reasoning. This underscores the broader point that while conscious reasoning is valuable, subconscious and intuitive processes also play a role in generating innovative ideas and creations.
So, the correct option is (D): great innovations across various fields can stem from flashes of intuition and are not always propelled by logical thinking.
The passage underscores Pinker's emphasis on sequential reasoning and the tools of rationality, suggesting that mastering these tools can enhance decision-making in various practical scenarios where individuals must navigate "uncertain and shifting information." The author's endorsement or support for Pinker's work revolves around the concept that logical reasoning "equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems" [Option B].
Option A is inaccurate - although the author acknowledges Pinker's perspective on rationality as a moral virtue, they note that Pinker's exploration of the role of moral and ethical education is lacking.
Option C focuses on a specific application of Pinker's views and fails to capture the broader message.
Option D similarly confines the discussion to the broader utility of rationality in decision-making.
So, the correct option is (B): equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems.
According to the discussion, the option not aligned with Pinker's perspective on rational thinking (and that of the ancient Greek philosophers) is Option C. The passage implies that while sequential reasoning holds value, many significant human breakthroughs stem from moments of epiphany or insight rather than solely from conscious, sequential reasoning.
In line with this notion, it is suggested that an emphasis on rational thought includes acknowledging the gaps in one's own knowledge [Option D] and "arriving at independent conclusions" [Option A]. As evidenced by the passage's reference to Plato's Socrates, who prefigured many of Pinker's arguments by almost 2,500 years, rational thinking involves recognizing one's limitations and thoroughly examining all premises in arguments rather than merely relying on speakers' authority or charisma.
Towards the passage's conclusion, it is mentioned that there exists an ethical and moral aspect [Option B] to rationality, which Pinker acknowledges but does not delve into extensively.
Therefore, Option C is the correct choice, as it does not align with Pinker's view on rational thinking as discussed in the passage.
“Why do they pull down and do away with crooked streets, I wonder, which are my delight, and hurt no man living? Every day the wealthier nations are pulling down one or another in their capitals and their great towns: they do not know why they do it; neither do I. It ought to be enough, surely, to drive the great broad ways which commerce needs and which are the life-channels of a modern city, without destroying all history and all the humanity in between: the islands of the past.” (From Hilaire Belloc’s “The Crooked Streets”)
Based only on the information provided in the above passage, which one of the following statements is true?