The author of the passage refers to ancient Greek philosophers to point out the gaps in Steven Pinker's argument about rationality. While Pinker views rationality as both a cognitive and moral virtue, the author suggests that he does not fully explore the role of moral and ethical education in shaping rational behavior.
By mentioning philosophers like Plato’s Socrates, who valued dreams and visions alongside reasoning, the author emphasizes that ethical and non-logical dimensions were integral to their understanding of rationality — aspects that Pinker largely overlooks.
Therefore, the correct answer is: Reveal gaps in Pinker's discussion of the importance of ethical considerations in rational behaviour.
The passage discusses Steven Pinker's views on rationality, particularly emphasizing its importance in both personal and civic life. While Pinker highlights the value of conscious, sequential reasoning, the passage also presents a contrast by acknowledging that many major achievements arise through creative intuition or sudden insight.
Examples such as Kekulé's discovery of the benzene structure and Mozart's symphonies illustrate how breakthrough ideas often emerge from flashes of intuition rather than from strict logical processes.
Therefore, the correct answer is: Great innovations across various fields can stem from flashes of intuition and are not always propelled by logical thinking.
The passage underscores Pinker's emphasis on sequential reasoning and the tools of rationality, suggesting that mastering these tools can enhance decision-making in various practical scenarios where individuals must navigate "uncertain and shifting information." The author's endorsement or support for Pinker's work revolves around the concept that logical reasoning "equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems" [Option B].
Option A is inaccurate - although the author acknowledges Pinker's perspective on rationality as a moral virtue, they note that Pinker's exploration of the role of moral and ethical education is lacking.
Option C focuses on a specific application of Pinker's views and fails to capture the broader message.
Option D similarly confines the discussion to the broader utility of rationality in decision-making.
So, the correct option is (B): equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems.
According to the discussion, the option not aligned with Pinker's perspective on rational thinking (and that of the ancient Greek philosophers) is Option C. The passage suggests that while sequential reasoning has its merits, many human breakthroughs arise from moments of epiphany or insight, not solely from deliberate, step-by-step reasoning.
Rational thought, as emphasized by Pinker and prefigured by Plato's Socrates, involves recognizing the limits of one’s knowledge (Option D) and arriving at independent conclusions (Option A), rather than depending on the authority or charisma of speakers.
Additionally, the passage acknowledges an ethical and moral dimension to rationality (Option B), which Pinker touches upon, though not in great depth.
Thus, Option C is the correct answer, as it diverges from Pinker’s outlined approach to rational thinking.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."