
(a) The reaction involves the formation of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) from an aldehyde (O) and hydroxylamine (HO-NH2) in the presence of an acid catalyst (H+):
\( O + HO-NH_2 \xrightarrow{H^+} NH_2OH \)
(b) The reaction involves ozonolysis of ethene (CH2=CH2) followed by reductive workup to form formaldehyde (HCHO). Heating (\( \Delta \)) does not change the product further:
\( CH_2=CH_2 \xrightarrow{(i) O_3 (ii) Zn-H_2O} 2HCHO \xrightarrow{\Delta} \text{No further change} \)
(c) The reaction involves the conversion of an alcohol (OH) to an alkyl chloride (Cl) using thionyl chloride (SOCl2) under heating (\( \Delta \)):
\( OH \xrightarrow{SOCl_2} Cl \)
(d) The reaction involves the conversion of an aldehyde (CHO) to a carboxylic acid (COOH) using sodium cyanide (NaCN) and hydrochloric acid (HCl):
\( CHO \xrightarrow{NaCN/HCl} COOH \)
(e) The reaction involves the methylation of chlorobenzene (Cl2C6H5) to form a methylated chlorobenzene derivative (Cl2C6H4CH3):
\( Cl_2C_6H_5 \xrightarrow{CH_3} Cl_2C_6H_4CH_3 \)
If the molar conductivity ($\Lambda_m$) of a 0.050 mol $L^{–1}$ solution of a monobasic weak acid is 90 S $cm^{2} mol^{–1}$, its extent (degree) of dissociation will be:
[Assume: $\Lambda^0$ = 349.6 S $cm^{2} mol^{–1}$ and $\Lambda^0_{\text{acid}}$ = 50.4 S$ cm^{2} mol^{–1}$]
How do the peddler from ‘The Rattrap’ and ‘the office boy’ from ‘Poets and Pancakes’ compare in terms of their frustration, status, and grudges against others?