Step 1: Analyze statement A.
Excessive nutrient inputs (eutrophication) cause massive algal blooms. When these algae die, they are decomposed by bacteria, a process that consumes large amounts of dissolved oxygen, leading to hypoxia or anoxia (low or no oxygen). Thus, the statement is incorrect.
Step 2: Analyze statement B.
Extensive algal blooms are a primary symptom of eutrophication, which is a state of poor ecological health for a lake, often leading to fish kills and loss of biodiversity. Thus, the statement is incorrect.
Step 3: Analyze statement C.
Eutrophic lakes are rich in nutrients and have high biological productivity. This leads to a large amount of organic matter (dead algae, etc.) that needs to be decomposed. This decomposition requires a lot of oxygen, meaning the lake has a high Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). This statement is correct.
Step 4: Analyze statement D.
Oligotrophic lakes are nutrient-poor and have low biological productivity. There is little organic matter to decompose, so they have a very low BOD. The statement claims they have high BOD compared to eutrophic lakes, which is the exact opposite of the truth. Thus, the statement is incorrect.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |