Step 1: Understanding the Premises
This is a logical deduction question based on statistics. Let's break down the information given:
Premise 1: Average Grade (Online) = Average Grade (Classroom).
Premise 2: The calculation of these averages includes withdrawals, which are counted as failures (let's say a grade of 'F' or 0).
Premise 3: Withdrawal Rate (Online) > Withdrawal Rate (Classroom). This means a higher percentage of the "grades" in the online average are failures due to withdrawal.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach
Let \(A_{O}\) be the average grade for online students who completed the course, and \(W_{O}\) be the withdrawal rate (as a percentage).
Let \(A_{C}\) be the average grade for classroom students who completed the course, and \(W_{C}\) be the withdrawal rate.
The overall average grade is a weighted average of the grades of those who completed and those who withdrew (who get a grade of 0).
Overall Avg (Online) = \(A_{O} \times (1 - W_{O}) + 0 \times W_{O} = A_{O} \times (1 - W_{O})\).
Overall Avg (Classroom) = \(A_{C} \times (1 - W_{C}) + 0 \times W_{C} = A_{C} \times (1 - W_{C})\).
From Premise 1, we know:
\[ A_{O} \times (1 - W_{O}) = A_{C} \times (1 - W_{C}) \]
From Premise 3, we know:
\[ W_{O} > W_{C} \]
This implies that:
\[ (1 - W_{O}) < (1 - W_{C}) \]
Step 3: Detailed Explanation
We have the equation \( A_{O} \times (1 - W_{O}) = A_{C} \times (1 - W_{C}) \).
We are trying to compare \(A_{O}\) and \(A_{C}\), which are the average grades for the students who did not withdraw.
Let's rearrange the equation to solve for the ratio of \(A_{O}\) to \(A_{C}\):
\[ \frac{A_{O}}{A_{C}} = \frac{1 - W_{C}}{1 - W_{O}} \]
Since we know that \( W_{O} > W_{C} \), the denominator \( (1 - W_{O}) \) is smaller than the numerator \( (1 - W_{C}) \).
When the numerator of a fraction is larger than the denominator (and both are positive), the value of the fraction is greater than 1.
Therefore, \( \frac{A_{O}}{A_{C}} > 1 \), which means \( A_{O} > A_{C} \).
This translates to: The average grade for online students who completed the course was higher than the average grade for classroom students who completed the course.
Step 4: Evaluating the Options
(A) This statement matches our logical deduction perfectly.
(B) We have no information about the absolute number of students, only about grades and withdrawal rates (percentages).
(C) The passage does not give any information to support this absolute claim.
(D) We only know about averages, not about the distribution of grades or the performance of the very top students.
(E) The passage gives no information about the difficulty of the subject matter. The difference in grades could be due to student motivation, teaching methods, etc. This is a possible explanation, but it is not something that must be true.
A research team is studying the effects of three different fertilizers (X, Y, and Z) on the growth of a specific plant species. They have four experimental plots with different fertilizer combinations: Plot 1: Fertilizer X only
Plot 2: Fertilizer Y only
Plot 3: Fertilizer X and Fertilizer Z only
Plot 4: Fertilizer Y and Fertilizer Z only
After a period of observation, they note the following: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{Plants in plots with Fertilizer X showed significantly increased height compared to a control group (no fertilizer).} \\ \bullet & \text{Plants in plots with Fertilizer Y showed a slightly increased leaf area compared to the control group.} \\ \bullet & \text{Plants in Plot 3 (X and Z) showed no significant difference in height compared to the control group.} \\ \bullet & \text{Plants in Plot 4 (Y and Z) showed significantly increased height compared to the control group.} \\ \end{array}\] Based on these observations, which of the following conclusions is best supported?
Statements: All apples are fruits. All fruits are tasty.
Conclusions: 1. All apples are tasty. 2. Some tasty things are apples.
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)