Given:
For Bank A: 6% interest p.a compounded half-yearly, which means interest is 3% for every half year. For Bank C: The annual interest rate is \( w \) times that of Bank B.
Raju invests \( P \) in Bank B for \( t \) time period and Rupa invests ₹10,000 in Bank C for \( 2t \) time period.
The interest that Raju earns from Bank B in \( t \) time = Interest from Bank A in 1 year.
1) Calculating interest for Bank A:
For compounded half-yearly, the amount after 1 year is:
\[ A = P\left(1 + \frac{r}{2}\right)^2 \] where \( r \) is the rate of interest in decimal form.
Amount after 1 year = \( P \times \left(1 + 0.03\right)^2 = P \times \left(1.03\right)^2 = 1.0609P \)
Interest from Bank A for 1 year is:
\[ \text{Interest} = 1.0609P - P = 0.0609P \]
2) Interest earned by Raju from Bank B for time \( t \):
Given that the interest Raju earns from Bank B for \( t \) time = 0.0609P (from the above calculation). Let the interest rate of Bank B be \( R \). The interest is:
\[ \text{Interest} = P \times R \times t = 0.0609P \] Thus, we have the equation: \[ R \times t = 0.0609 \]
3) Bank C's interest rate is \( wR \):
The interest Rupa earns from Bank C is:
\[ \text{Interest} = 10000 \times wR \times 2t = 20000 \times wR \times t \] From step 2, we know \( wR \times t = 0.0609 \), so we can substitute it into the equation:
\[ \text{Interest} = 20000 \times 0.0609 = ₹1218 \]
Since Rupa invests for \( 2t \) time, the total interest earned is:
\[ 2 \times ₹1218 = ₹2436 \]
Conclusion: The correct answer is ₹2436.
Bank A offers a six percent interest rate that compounds every six months. This equates to a half-year interest rate of three percent. After a year of investment in Bank A by Principal \( P \), the amount becomes:
\(P(1.03)(1.03) = P(1.0609)\) at the end of the year.
This means that the interest rate is 6.09% annually when looking at it as a simple interest plan.
Rupa's Investment in Bank C:
Rupa invests in Bank C, which offers twice the interest rate as Bank B and twice the investment amount. As a result, Rupa essentially receives four times the interest that Raju receives from making the identical investment in Bank A.
Assume Raju made a ₹10,000 investment in Bank B. Since this is equivalent to making a one-year investment in Bank A, the interest Raju will receive from his ₹10,000 investment is 6.09% of ₹10,000, which amounts to ₹609.
Rupa now needs to make four times as much as ₹609 for the same investment. Therefore, the interest Rupa earns is:
\(₹ 609 \times 4 = ₹ 2,436\)
Conclusion: Rupa earns ₹ 2,436 as interest from her investment in Bank C.
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)