- Assertion (A): The assertion claims that the domain of $(f + g)(x) = e^x + \log x$ is $\mathbb{R}$.
However, this is incorrect. While $f(x) = e^x$ is defined for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, the function $g(x) = \log x$ is only defined for $x > 0$.
Therefore, the domain of $(f + g)(x)$ is not $\mathbb{R}$, but rather $(0, \infty)$.
So, Assertion (A) is incorrect.
- Reason (R): The reason is correct. The domain of the sum of two functions is the intersection of the domains of the individual functions.
The domain of $f(x) = e^x$ is $\mathbb{R}$, and the domain of $g(x) = \log x$ is $(0, \infty)$. Thus, the domain of $(f + g)(x)$ is the intersection of these two domains, which is $(0, \infty)$. Thus, Assertion (A) is incorrect, but Reason (R) is correct.
During the festival season, a mela was organized by the Resident Welfare Association at a park near the society. The main attraction of the mela was a huge swing, which traced the path of a parabola given by the equation:\[ x^2 = y \quad \text{or} \quad f(x) = x^2 \]
Simar, Tanvi, and Umara were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 5 : 6 : 9. On 31st March, 2024, their Balance Sheet was as follows:
Liabilities | Amount (₹) | Assets | Amount (₹) |
Capitals: | Fixed Assets | 25,00,000 | |
Simar | 13,00,000 | Stock | 10,00,000 |
Tanvi | 12,00,000 | Debtors | 8,00,000 |
Umara | 14,00,000 | Cash | 7,00,000 |
General Reserve | 7,00,000 | Profit and Loss A/c | 2,00,000 |
Trade Payables | 6,00,000 | ||
Total | 52,00,000 | Total | 52,00,000 |
Umara died on 30th June, 2024. The partnership deed provided for the following on the death of a partner: