The term "topophobia" is employed in the text. This passage is the most straightforward among all.
The response to the initial question is located within the passage's concluding sentence, where the author presents the concept of 'topophobia.'
"And in the same way that a cherished landscape is unexpectedly unveiled, landscapes of fear may also cast a gloomy shadow over a location, eliciting a feeling of dread or anxiety—commonly known as topophobia."
Consequently, Option 1 is the correct selection.
This question's resolution hinges on grasping the context in which the phrase is employed. The passage states:
"Residents of upscale residential developments have disclosed how important it is to maintain their community’s distinct identity, often by casting themselves in a superior social position and by reinforcing class and racial differences."
Undoubtedly, Option 2 is the correct answer. The simplicity of the question is evident, leaving no room for uncertainty.
The key to answering this question lies in examining the sentence that follows the given one. Subsequent to the provided sentence in the passage, it reads:
"Topophilia is difficult to design for and impossible to quantify, and its most articulate interpreters have been self-reflective philosophers such as Henry David Thoreau, evoking a marvelously intricate sense of place at Walden Pond, and Tuan, describing his deep affinity for the desert."
Henry David Thoreau appreciates the pond, whereas Tuan expresses his profound connection to the desert. This indicates subjectivity.
Consequently, Option 1 is the correct choice.
The term "topophilia" denotes an affection or love for a specific place. Eliminating options based on this definition:
- Option 2 is eliminated as it expresses "least affinity for the place," which is contrary to the concept of love.
- Option 3 is ruled out because it implies that the French are not patriotic, and topophilia is associated with a love for a place, which often brings about a sense of patriotism.
- Topography, as mentioned, is unrelated to love for a place.
Therefore, Option 1 is the only choice aligning with the meaning of topophilia, as it reflects love for a particular place.
This question presents a moderate level of difficulty, requiring careful consideration of the options to identify the one that does not contradict the author's stance. Options that go against the author's argument will be in conflict with the author's viewpoint.
Option 1 contradicts the author's statement because the author indicates that olfactory response is the third most important factor, while this option asserts it as the most important.
Option 2 is dismissible because the author, in the first paragraph, states that emotive ties with the material environment vary greatly among individuals, using the term 'vary greatly,' while the option suggests 'vary little.'
Option 3 aligns with the author's perspective, particularly evident in the last paragraph, making it a suitable choice that doesn't contradict the author's argument.
Option 4 is not consistent with the author's viewpoint. The author expresses skepticism about New Urbanism's ability to fulfill its intentions, whereas the option suggests its success in meeting client demand.
Therefore, Option 3 is the correct choice as it does not contradict the author's assertions.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |