In the first paragraph, the lines mention, "In the postcolonial fervour of the 20th century, coastal capitals picked by trade-focused empires were spurned for 'regionally neutral' new ones." This indicates that colonial powers were indeed focused on trade. Therefore, Option 2 is the correct choice.
This question is derived from the second-to-last paragraph of the passage, where the dilemma of choosing between small towns and larger cities is discussed.
The passage states, "The dilemma is obvious. Pick small, poor towns, and areas of high unemployment get new jobs, but it is hard to attract the most qualified workers; opt for larger cities with infrastructure and better-qualified residents, and the country’s most deprived areas see little benefit."
Considering the options:
Option 2 suggests keeping government agencies in large cities, which does not align with the presented dilemma of choosing between small towns and larger cities.
Option 3 doesn't address the two choices presented in the passage.
Option 4 brings up private enterprise, which is outside the scope of the given dilemma.
Option 1 is the most appropriate answer, as it reflects the essence of the dilemma: whether to relocate to remote areas or to relatively larger cities, representing the choice between option x or option y.
In this question, the task is to choose an option that would not be used by people who support the decentralization of central government functions.
Option 1 supports decentralization and has been discussed in the passage, particularly regarding the cost factor. Therefore, it is not the correct choice.
New ideas and autonomy in regulation are mentioned in the second paragraph, supporting decentralization. Thus, options 2 and 3 are also out.
Option 4 is not presented as a reason supporting decentralization in the passage. Therefore, it aligns with the task of choosing an option that would not be used by supporters of decentralization and is the correct choice in this context.
This question revolves around vocabulary, and "pedigree" is synonymous with "history." Therefore, a "long pedigree" refers to something that has a lengthy history. Consequently, Option 4 is the correct choice.
This question involves a double negative, so it's important to carefully read and simplify it. According to the author, relocating government agencies has not always been successful. The task is to identify the option that is not one of the reasons for the lack of success.
In the passage, the point about corruption is mentioned towards the end, so option 3 is a reason. The passage also discusses staff losses and the difficulty of attracting talent. However, option 4 is not mentioned in the passage and must be the correct choice.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |