In the first paragraph, the lines mention, "In the postcolonial fervour of the 20th century, coastal capitals picked by trade-focused empires were spurned for 'regionally neutral' new ones." This indicates that colonial powers were indeed focused on trade. Therefore, Option 2 is the correct choice.
This question is derived from the second-to-last paragraph of the passage, where the dilemma of choosing between small towns and larger cities is discussed.
The passage states, "The dilemma is obvious. Pick small, poor towns, and areas of high unemployment get new jobs, but it is hard to attract the most qualified workers; opt for larger cities with infrastructure and better-qualified residents, and the country’s most deprived areas see little benefit."
Considering the options:
Option 2 suggests keeping government agencies in large cities, which does not align with the presented dilemma of choosing between small towns and larger cities.
Option 3 doesn't address the two choices presented in the passage.
Option 4 brings up private enterprise, which is outside the scope of the given dilemma.
Option 1 is the most appropriate answer, as it reflects the essence of the dilemma: whether to relocate to remote areas or to relatively larger cities, representing the choice between option x or option y.
In this question, the task is to choose an option that would not be used by people who support the decentralization of central government functions.
Option 1 supports decentralization and has been discussed in the passage, particularly regarding the cost factor. Therefore, it is not the correct choice.
New ideas and autonomy in regulation are mentioned in the second paragraph, supporting decentralization. Thus, options 2 and 3 are also out.
Option 4 is not presented as a reason supporting decentralization in the passage. Therefore, it aligns with the task of choosing an option that would not be used by supporters of decentralization and is the correct choice in this context.
This question revolves around vocabulary, and "pedigree" is synonymous with "history." Therefore, a "long pedigree" refers to something that has a lengthy history. Consequently, Option 4 is the correct choice.
This question involves a double negative, so it's important to carefully read and simplify it. According to the author, relocating government agencies has not always been successful. The task is to identify the option that is not one of the reasons for the lack of success.
In the passage, the point about corruption is mentioned towards the end, so option 3 is a reason. The passage also discusses staff losses and the difficulty of attracting talent. However, option 4 is not mentioned in the passage and must be the correct choice.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."