Comprehension
Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers

An example of a scientist who could measure without instruments is Enrico Fermi (1901-1954), a physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1938. He had a well-developed knack for intuitive, even casual-sounding measurements. One renowned example of his measurement skills was demonstrated at the first detonation of the atom bomb, the Trinity Test site, on July 16, 1945, where he was one of the atomic scientists observing the blast from base camp. While final adjustments were being made to instruments used to measure the yield of the blast, Fermi was making confetti out of a page of notebook paper. As the wind from the initial blast wave began to blow through the camp, he slowly dribbled the confetti into the air, observing how far back it was scattered by the blast (taking the farthest scattered pieces as being the peak of the pressure wave). Fermi concluded that the yield must be greater than 10 kilotons. This would have been news since other initial observers of the blast did not know that lower limit. After much analysis of the instrument readings, the final yield estimate was determined to be 18.6 kilotons. Like Eratosthenes, Fermi was aware of a rule relating one simple observation — the scattering of confetti in the wind — to a quantity he wanted to measure.

The value of quick estimates was something Fermi was familiar with throughout his career. He was famous for teaching his students skills at approximation of fanciful-sounding quantities that, at first glance, they might presume they knew nothing about. The best-known example of such a "Fermi question" was Fermi asking his students to estimate the number of piano tuners in Chicago, when no one knows the answer. His students — science and engineering majors — would begin by saying that they could not possibly know anything about such a quantity. Of course, some solutions would be to simply do a count of every piano tuner perhaps by looking up advertisements, checking with a licensing agency of some sort, and so on. But Fermi was trying to teach his students how to solve problems where the ability to confirm the results would not be so easy. He wanted them to figure out that they knew something about the quantity in question.
Question: 1

Suppose you apply the same logic as Fermi applied to confetti, which of the following statements would be the most appropriate?

Show Hint

To apply Fermi’s method, look for observable quantities that can be related to the target measurement in a simple way. Avoid requiring complex or direct measurements.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
  • You can calculate the minimum pressure inside the cooker by calculating the maximum distance travelled by any of its parts after it explodes.
  • You can calculate the average potency of a firecracker by calculating the distance covered by one of its bigger fragments.
  • You can easily find out the average potency of an earthquake by measuring the length of a crack it makes on the surface of the earth.
  • You can calculate the exact volume of water stored in a tank by measuring the distance covered by the stream of water coming out of the tap fixed on the lower corner of the tank.
  • All of the above conclusions can be drawn.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Analyze the Fermi method.
- Fermi applied simple observations, like the scattering of confetti, to estimate complex quantities. The key is finding a way to link a measurable quantity (distance, in the case of confetti) to the target quantity (blast pressure or yield).
Step 2: Relate the options to Fermi’s logic.
- Option (A) follows a similar pattern: By observing the distance the parts of the cooker travel after an explosion, you can estimate the pressure. This is a simple, intuitive approximation method based on observable outcomes.
Step 3: Eliminate the other options.
- Option (B) and (C) do not seem to connect simple observations with complex quantities in the same way.
- Option (D) involves a more direct measurement, making it unlike the intuitive estimation Fermi used.
Therefore: The correct answer is \boxed{(A)}.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Quick estimate, as per Fermi, is most useful in:

Show Hint

When using Fermi’s estimation method, focus on calculating a range of values, not precise figures. It’s about finding an approximate range.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
  • In finding an approximate that is more useful than existing values.
  • In finding out the exact minimum value of an estimate
  • In finding out the exact maximum value of an estimate
  • In finding out the range of values of an estimate
  • In finding out the average value of an estimate
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand the purpose of Fermi estimates.
- Fermi’s quick estimation method is useful for approximating quantities when direct measurement is difficult. The goal is not to find the exact value but to estimate the range of possible values. This method gives a rough idea of the lower and upper bounds of the quantity.
Step 2: Eliminate the incorrect options.
- (A) is too vague since Fermi’s method is about approximation, not necessarily improving upon existing values.
- (B) and (C) focus on exact values, which Fermi's method doesn't aim for.
- (E) focuses on averages, which doesn’t align with Fermi's purpose of finding ranges.
Therefore: The correct answer is \boxed{(D)}.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Given below are some statements that attempt to capture the central idea of the passage:
1. It is useful to estimate; even when the exact answer is known.
2. It is possible to estimate any physical quantity.
3. It is possible to estimate the number of units of a newly launched car that can be sold in a city.
4. Fermi was a genius.
Which of the following statements best captures the central idea?

Show Hint

When choosing the best statement that captures the central idea, look for the option that reflects the main principle discussed, not supplementary or specific details.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
  • 1, 2 and 4
  • 2, 3 and 4
  • 2 and 3
  • 2 only
  • 1, 2 and 3
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Focus on the central idea of the passage.
- The passage highlights the concept of estimation, particularly in Fermi’s approach to using intuitive approximations.
- Statement 2 captures this idea directly, emphasizing the ability to estimate any physical quantity, which aligns with Fermi’s method.
Step 2: Evaluate the other options.
- Statement 1 is useful but not central to the main idea of estimation in the context of Fermi’s method.
- Statement 3 is too specific and doesn’t capture the broader point of estimation.
- Statement 4, while complimentary, doesn’t contribute to the central idea of estimation.
Therefore: The correct answer is \boxed{(D)}.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

Read the statements given below:
1. Atomic bomb detonation was a result of Fermi's Nobel Prize contribution.
2. Fermi's students respected him as a scientist.
3. Yield of atomic bomb can only be measured in Kilotons.
Which of the following statement(s) can be inferred from the passage?

Show Hint

When answering inference questions, be cautious about statements not directly supported by the passage. Look for phrases and facts explicitly mentioned in the text.
Updated On: Aug 26, 2025
  • 1, 2
  • 2, 3
  • 1, 3
  • 2 only
  • None of the three statements is correct, hence cannot be inferred from the passage.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Analyze statement 1.
- The passage does not directly attribute the detonation of the atomic bomb to Fermi's Nobel Prize contribution. It mentions that Fermi was observing the blast, but no direct link to his Nobel Prize is made.
Step 2: Analyze statement 2.
- The passage states Fermi's respect from his students for his estimation skills, but it does not specifically mention whether they respected him as a scientist.
Step 3: Analyze statement 3.
- The passage discusses Fermi’s estimation using the confetti method for approximating the atomic bomb’s yield, but it does not state that the yield can only be measured in kilotons.
Therefore: The correct answer is \boxed{(E)}.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions