An urgent problem is now threatening libraries throughout the world. Their collections, which are crucial for
diverse purposes as economic development, educational research and recreational pursuits, are in danger
of disintegrating.
The problem is mainly due to one cause – the type of paper on which books have been printed for the past
one and a half centuries. Until the 1850s, paper was produced from linen or cotton rags and proved to be
relatively long-lasting. In the mid-19th century, however, the popular demand for paper and the commercial
need for an economic method of production led to the use of mechanically ground wood pulp. Paper
manufactured for wood pulp is highly acidic and therefore inherently unstable. It contains lignin – a major
factor in causing paper to discolour and disintegrate. The useful lifespan of most 20th-century book papers
has been estimated to be no more than a few decades.
Libraries comprise an important part of the market for printed books and they are increasingly aware of the
fragility of this material. The extent of the deterioration of library collections is alarming. Surveys conducted
at various major institutions reveal that 26% to 40% of the books they hold are seriously embrittled and
thus unavailable for normal use.
Programmes are now being developed with two main aims in mind – on the one hand, to improve the
physical condition of library collections, especially by the process called ‘mass de-acidification’ (which is
designed to eliminate acid from the paper of published books and insert a buffer compound that will provide
protection against future acid attack from the environment); and on the other, to transfer the contents of
existing books to another medium (such as microfilm or optical disk).
Libraries will only be able to carry out these special tasks with the assistance of other experts such as
book conservators and high-technology specialists. But here is another group with whom librarians have
traditionally enjoyed strong affinities and whose co-operation will be crucial if the problem of decaying
collections is to be arrested – namely, the printing and publishing industries. The existing problem – that of
book collections already assembled in libraries – is of vast proportions, but it is intensified by the continuing
use of acid-based paper in book publishing. The key issue is how to preserve the books of the future, not
simply those of the past.
If the future dimensions of the conservation problem are to be curbed, there will need to be widespread
adoption of paper which is of archival quality.
This change does not relate to a narrowly perceived need because the long term preservation of library
collections is important – both for the overall social benefits they bring as well as for the special advantages
they bestow on the printing and publishing industries.
In the first place, libraries are of critical importance to the future well-being of citizens since they provide the
knowledge base of society. They contain the record of humanity – the accumulation of ideas and insights
and discoveries on which social effort and progress are possible. The destruction of libraries would represent
an immense cultural loss, a form of amnesia which would affect every member of society.
In the second place, printers and publishers have an economic interest in turning to paper of archival
quality. So long as the libraries are acquiring books with a short lifespan they will be forced to devote an
increasing share of their budgets to conservation. These budgets are severely strained by the combined
impact of inflation and currency devaluation, and there is scarcely any prospect of enlarged government
funding. As a result, libraries will be compelled to balance the preservation of their collections against the
expansion of those collations. In short, the choice will be between conservation and acquisition – and the
funds for conservation are likely to come from acquisition budgets. This unpalatable choice will damage
both libraries and the printing and publishing industries and can only be minimized in its effects by a bold
decision to convert to use of permanent paper.