Option B can be readily deduced from the concluding lines of the initial paragraph. The rest of the options are unrelated to the context.
So, the correct answer is (B): Aggressor – Circumstances of aggression – Victim.
Option D presents a twisted interpretation. It misrepresents the content provided in the passage. While the passage discusses Freud's identification of the death instinct, it does not delve into the concept of moderating it or controlling resulting aggression.
Therefore, this option is entirely irrelevant and inaccurate.
So, the correct option is (D): aggression in most societies is kept under control through moderating the death instinct identified by Freud.
Consider the final paragraph of the passage, which suggests that some influential viewpoints argue for a biological foundation for aggression, proposing that humans evolved with a notably diminished neural inhibition of aggressive instincts.
In contrast, the second option incorrectly discusses the neural regulation of testosterone. Therefore, this option is deemed as the correct answer.
So, The correct answer is (B): a common theory of aggression is that it is the result of an abnormally low neural regulation of testosterone.
Let's examine the options individually.
Option A presents a distorted view. The sentence does not pertain to the reliability of the information but rather focuses on inherent aggression.
Option B is also inaccurate. The passage does not mention anything regarding the scenario where the enemy refuses to reveal information, making this option irrelevant.
Option C, however, accurately captures the essence of the passage. It highlights that sometimes the aggressor does not intend to cause pain but uses it as a means to achieve a utilitarian end. Hence, this is the correct option.
Option D, is also incorrect. The passage does not discuss the most effective method to extract information.
The correct answer is (C): In certain kinds of aggression, inflicting pain is not the objective, and is no more than a utilitarian means to achieve another end.
\(\text{The Politics of Change}\) | \(\text{The Change in Politics}\) | \(\text{Politics and Change:}\) A Global Perspective} |
In "The Politics of Change," political analyst Dr. Emily Harper examines the dynamics of social movements and their impact on policy reform. Through detailed case studies, she explores how grassroots organizations, protests, and advocacy campaigns shape public opinion and influence lawmakers. Dr. Harper provides insights into the strategies that successful movements employ and discusses the challenges they face in a complex political landscape. She discusses key strategies, such as coalition-building, media engagement, and the use of digital platforms to amplify voices. | This book by veteran journalist Mark Stevens investigates the shifting political landscape in the 21st century. Focusing on major elections, emerging political parties, and the role of social media, Stevens analyzes how technology and demographics are transforming political engagement and voter behaviour. Through interviews with political leaders, campaign strategists, and everyday voters, Stevens uncovers how demographic shifts and technological advancements are reshaping political discourse in urban areas. He analyzes the implications of these changes for traditional political institutions and explores how movements like #MeToo and Black Lives Matter have disrupted conventional narratives. | In this insightful work, international relations scholar Dr. Anika Patel presents a global analysis of political change across various regions. She explores the factors that drive political transitions, including economic shifts, cultural movements, and international influences. Dr. Patel emphasizes the interconnectedness of global politics and how local changes can have far-reaching implications. She analyzes various factors driving political transitions, including economic upheaval, cultural shifts, and the impact of globalization. She provides case studies from diverse regions, such as the Arab Spring, democratic movements in Latin America, and shifts in power in Asia. The book serves as a vital resource for understanding the complexities of political evolution in a rapidly changing world. |