Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks for the section in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, that allows a court to alter or add to a charge that has already been framed.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Chapter XVII of the CrPC deals with "The Charge" (Sections 211 to 224).
- Section 216 of the CrPC is titled "Court may alter charge."
- Section 216(1) states: "Any Court may alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced."
This section gives the court wide powers to change the charge based on the evidence that comes on record during the trial, to ensure that the accused is tried for the correct offence. The section also has safeguards, requiring that the alteration be read and explained to the accused.
- Section 210 deals with the procedure to be followed when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of the same offence.
- Section 214 states that in every charge, words used in describing an offence shall be deemed to have been used in the sense attached to them by the law under which such offence is punishable.
- Section 215 deals with the effect of errors in the charge, stating that no error shall be regarded as material unless the accused was misled.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The provision for alteration or addition of charges is provided under Section 216 of the CrPC.
Having heard the learned Counsels for the parties, and on perusal of the ma terial on record, the primary issue which arises for consideration of this Court is ”whether a review or recall of an order passed in a criminal proceeding initiated under section 340 of CrPC is permissible or not?” [...] A careful consideration of the statutory provisions and the aforesaid decisions of this Court clarify the now-well settled position of jurisprudence of Section 362 of CrPC which when summarized would be that the criminal courts, as envisaged under the CrPC, are barred from altering or reviewing in their own judgments except for the exceptions which are explicitly provided by the statute, namely, correction of a clerical or an arithmetical error that might have been committed or the said power is provided under any other law for the time being in force. As the courts become functus officio the very moment a judgment or an order is signed, the bar of Section 362 CrPC becomes applicable. Despite the powers provided under Section 482 CrPC which, this veil cannot allow the courts to step beyond or circumvent an explicit bar. It also stands clarified that it is only in situations wherein an application for recall of an order or judgment seeking a procedural review that the bar would not apply and not a substantive review where the bar as contained in Section 362 CrPC is attracted. Numerous decisions of this Court have also elaborated that the bar under said provision is to be applied stricto sensu.
(Extracted with edits and revisions from Vikram Bakshi v. RP Khosla 2025 INSC 1020)